Natural Language Processing-Based Model for Litigation Outcome Prediction: Decision-Making Support for Residential Building Defect Alternative Dispute Resolution

Defects occurring during the maintenance phase of residential buildings not only undermine the quality of life of residents but also lead to disputes with contractors, which often escalate into litigation rather than being resolved through alternative dispute resolution (ADR), thereby increasing social and economic burdens. While previous studies have mainly focused on identifying the causes of defects, developing classification systems, and improving institutional frameworks, few have sought to predict litigation outcomes from precedent data to support decision-making during pre-litigation dispute resolution. This paper proposes a natural language processing-based multimodal and multitask prediction model that learns from precedent data using information available prior to litigation, such as the claims and evidence of plaintiffs and defendants and the claimed amounts. The proposed model simultaneously predicts judgment outcomes and grant ratios in defect-related disputes and can help to enhance the persuasiveness and voluntariness of ADR by informing parties about the likelihood of settlement and the potential risks of litigation. Furthermore, this paper proposes a decision-support framework for rational and evidence-based dispute resolution which can reduce stakeholder uncertainty and ultimately lower the frequency of litigation related to residential building defects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111565
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Natural Language Processing-Based Model for Litigation Outcome Prediction: Decision-Making Support for Residential Building Defect Alternative Dispute Resolution

Joosung Lee, Jae-Jun Kim, Chang Kyoo Jung
Applied Sciences
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Natural Language Processing-Based Model for Litigation Outcome Prediction: Decision-Making Support for Residential Building Defect Alternative Dispute Resolution

Joosung Lee, Jae-Jun Kim, Chang Kyoo Jung
article en

Abstract

Defects occurring during the maintenance phase of residential buildings not only undermine the quality of life of residents but also lead to disputes with contractors, which often escalate into litigation rather than being resolved through alternative dispute resolution (ADR), thereby increasing social and economic burdens. While previous studies have mainly focused on identifying the causes of defects, developing classification systems, and improving institutional frameworks, few have sought to predict litigation outcomes from precedent data to support decision-making during pre-litigation dispute resolution. This paper proposes a natural language processing-based multimodal and multitask prediction model that learns from precedent data using information available prior to litigation, such as the claims and evidence of plaintiffs and defendants and the claimed amounts. The proposed model simultaneously predicts judgment outcomes and grant ratios in defect-related disputes and can help to enhance the persuasiveness and voluntariness of ADR by informing parties about the likelihood of settlement and the potential risks of litigation. Furthermore, this paper proposes a decision-support framework for rational and evidence-based dispute resolution which can reduce stakeholder uncertainty and ultimately lower the frequency of litigation related to residential building defects.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(21)
Kangwon National University (KR), Hanyang University (KR)
National Research Foundation, Kangwon National University, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.