Head‐to‐head comparison of <scp>TKI</scp> and <scp>CPI</scp> first‐line treatment strategies in advanced renal cell carcinoma—Real‐world data from the German research platform <scp>CARAT</scp>

The combination of two immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) or a CPI with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has expanded the therapeutic options for advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) beyond TKI monotherapy. In the absence of head-to-head randomized trials comparing these strategies, we estimate their real-world effectiveness by emulating a hypothetical randomized trial. A total of 936 patients with aRCC from the prospective, observational, multicenter clinical registry CARAT (NCT03374267) starting first-line treatment after January 15, 2019, were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to compare first-line CPI + TKI (n = 447), CPI + CPI (n = 257), and TKI monotherapy (n = 166). Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), overall survival (OS), and time-to-deterioration (TTD) of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were analyzed, also stratified by patients' prognostic risk according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) model. IPTW-adjusted median rwPFS and OS independent of IMDC risk were 12.3 [10.4-15.6] and 29.0 months [25.6-36.3] for TKI + CPI, 8.3 [6.5-10.9] and 21.9 months [16.3-34.5] for CPI + CPI, and 8.5 [6.4-10.0] and 31.7 months [21.0-40.0] for TKI monotherapy. Compared to CPI + TKI, survival tended to be worse for CPI + CPI (rwPFS: hazard ratio (HR) 1.25 [1.00-1.58]; OS: HR 1.25 [0.95, 1.63]). This finding was more pronounced for rwPFS in patients at intermediate risk. Median TTD of HRQoL did not substantially differ between the strategies. Despite the lack of statistically significant HR differences in rwPFS and OS, there was a trend toward superior survival with first-line CPI + TKI compared to CPI + CPI. TKI monotherapy may remain a viable first-line treatment option in selected patient populations. Further analyses, preferentially randomized clinical trials, are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cancer
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70211
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Head‐to‐head comparison of TKI and CPI first‐line treatment strategies in advanced renal cell carcinoma—Real‐world data from the German research platform CARAT

Viktor Grünwald, Dominik Marschner, Carsten Grüllich, Uwe M. Martens et al.
International Journal of Cancer
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Head‐to‐head comparison of TKI and CPI first‐line treatment strategies in advanced renal cell carcinoma—Real‐world data from the German research platform CARAT

Viktor Grünwald, Dominik Marschner, Carsten Grüllich, Uwe M. Martens, M T Koska, Martina Jänicke, Carolin Lennartz, Arnd Nusch, Karin Potthoff, Martin Bögemann, Anja Kaiser‐Osterhues, Peter J. Goebell, Michael D. Staehler, Lothar Müller, Eyck von der Heyde
article en

Abstract

The combination of two immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) or a CPI with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has expanded the therapeutic options for advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) beyond TKI monotherapy. In the absence of head-to-head randomized trials comparing these strategies, we estimate their real-world effectiveness by emulating a hypothetical randomized trial. A total of 936 patients with aRCC from the prospective, observational, multicenter clinical registry CARAT (NCT03374267) starting first-line treatment after January 15, 2019, were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to compare first-line CPI + TKI (n = 447), CPI + CPI (n = 257), and TKI monotherapy (n = 166). Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), overall survival (OS), and time-to-deterioration (TTD) of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were analyzed, also stratified by patients' prognostic risk according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) model. IPTW-adjusted median rwPFS and OS independent of IMDC risk were 12.3 [10.4-15.6] and 29.0 months [25.6-36.3] for TKI + CPI, 8.3 [6.5-10.9] and 21.9 months [16.3-34.5] for CPI + CPI, and 8.5 [6.4-10.0] and 31.7 months [21.0-40.0] for TKI monotherapy. Compared to CPI + TKI, survival tended to be worse for CPI + CPI (rwPFS: hazard ratio (HR) 1.25 [1.00-1.58]; OS: HR 1.25 [0.95, 1.63]). This finding was more pronounced for rwPFS in patients at intermediate risk. Median TTD of HRQoL did not substantially differ between the strategies. Despite the lack of statistically significant HR differences in rwPFS and OS, there was a trend toward superior survival with first-line CPI + TKI compared to CPI + CPI. TKI monotherapy may remain a viable first-line treatment option in selected patient populations. Further analyses, preferentially randomized clinical trials, are warranted.

International Journal of CancerVol. 158(6)
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), Sana Kliniken AG (DE), University Hospital Münster (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE), Iomedico (Germany) (DE), Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie (DE), SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn (DE), Klinikum Stuttgart (DE), West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.