Mapping the Spatial Distribution of Fast Radio Bursts within their Host Galaxies

Abstract We present deep optical and near-infrared observations of the host galaxies of 34 fast radio bursts (FRBs) detected by the Commensal Real-time ASKAP Fast Transient (or CRAFT) survey on the Australian SKA Pathfinder (ASKAP) to compare the locations of FRBs relative to their host light distributions. Incorporating three additional FRBs from the literature, for a total of four repeating and 33 apparently nonrepeating FRBs, we determine their projected galactocentric offsets and find a median of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5.7</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> kpc ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1.5</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ). We model their host surface-brightness profiles and develop synthetic spatial distributions of their globular clusters (GCs) based on host properties. We calculate the likelihood the observed location of each FRB is consistent with the smooth light of its host galaxy, residual (primarily spiral) substructure, or GC distributions. The majority of FRBs favor locations within the disks of their galaxies, while only 11% ± 5% favor a GC origin, primarily those with galactocentric offsets ≳3 r e . At z &lt; 0.15, where spiral structure is apparent in 86% of our sample of FRB hosts, we find ≈20%–46% of FRBs favor an association with spiral arms. Assuming FRBs derive from magnetars, our results support multiple formation channels, with the majority of progenitors associated with massive stars and a minority formed through dynamical channels. However, the moderate fraction of FRBs associated with spiral structure indicates that high star formation efficiency of the youngest and most massive stars is not a predominant driver in the production of FRB progenitors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae0298
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the Spatial Distribution of Fast Radio Bursts within their Host Galaxies

C. D. Kilpatrick, Sungsoon Lim, K. Gourdji, Apurba Bera et al.
6 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
6.93
article

Mapping the Spatial Distribution of Fast Radio Bursts within their Host Galaxies

C. D. Kilpatrick, Sungsoon Lim, K. Gourdji, Apurba Bera, Nicolás Tejos, Wen‐fai Fong, R. M. Shannon, K. W. Bannister, Jason Xavier Prochaska, Yuxin 雨欣 Dong 董, Marcin Glowacki, N. D. R. Bhat, Joscha N. Jahns-Schindler, Tarraneh Eftekhari, Vivek Gupta, S. D. Ryder, Alexa C. Gordon, Lachlan James Marnoch, Akhil Jaini, Eric W. Peng, Adam T. Deller, Sunil Simha, Tyson Dial, Chang Liu, Yuanming Wang, Ziteng Wang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract We present deep optical and near-infrared observations of the host galaxies of 34 fast radio bursts (FRBs) detected by the Commensal Real-time ASKAP Fast Transient (or CRAFT) survey on the Australian SKA Pathfinder (ASKAP) to compare the locations of FRBs relative to their host light distributions. Incorporating three additional FRBs from the literature, for a total of four repeating and 33 apparently nonrepeating FRBs, we determine their projected galactocentric offsets and find a median of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5.7</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> kpc ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1.5</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ). We model their host surface-brightness profiles and develop synthetic spatial distributions of their globular clusters (GCs) based on host properties. We calculate the likelihood the observed location of each FRB is consistent with the smooth light of its host galaxy, residual (primarily spiral) substructure, or GC distributions. The majority of FRBs favor locations within the disks of their galaxies, while only 11% ± 5% favor a GC origin, primarily those with galactocentric offsets ≳3 r e . At z &lt; 0.15, where spiral structure is apparent in 86% of our sample of FRB hosts, we find ≈20%–46% of FRBs favor an association with spiral arms. Assuming FRBs derive from magnetars, our results support multiple formation channels, with the majority of progenitors associated with massive stars and a minority formed through dynamical channels. However, the moderate fraction of FRBs associated with spiral structure indicates that high star formation efficiency of the youngest and most massive stars is not a predominant driver in the production of FRB progenitors.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 993(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
6.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.