Soil Type, Tomato Genotype, and Pathogen Stress Shape the Tomato Rhizobacterial Community

Although the effects of soil type, plant genotype, and pathogen invasion on plant rhizosphere microbiomes have been preliminarily explored, their relative contributions and interactive influences on rhizobacterial community assembly remain unclear. In this study, we used tomato as a model to evaluate the individual and combined impacts of these three factors on rhizosphere bacterial community structure and function within a unified experimental framework. Microbiome-based analyses revealed that soil type was the predominant driver, explaining 53.1% of structural and 49.6% of functional variation, followed by tomato genotype (15.6% and 36.1%, respectively) and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol) inoculation (2.1% and 0.9%). Notably, the interaction between soil type and tomato genotype exerted a stronger influence than any other factor combination. Total nitrogen emerged as the key abiotic factor shaping the taxonomic composition of rhizobacterial communities, whereas soil pH played a dominant role in determining their functional profiles. Distinct tomato genotypes harbored rhizobacterial communities with divergent taxonomic and functional compositions. Although pathogen inoculation triggered the recruitment of beneficial microbes by the host plants, its impact on rhizobacterial community assembly was considerably weaker compared with the effects of soil type and tomato genotype. These findings provide a framework for understanding how soil, host, and pathogen collectively shape rhizobacterial communities and offer insights for optimizing microbiome management in crop production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15112517
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soil Type, Tomato Genotype, and Pathogen Stress Shape the Tomato Rhizobacterial Community

Jian Ling, Chun‐Yang Pan, Zhenchuan Mao, Xingzhong Liu et al.
2 citations
Agronomy
Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
3.50
article

Soil Type, Tomato Genotype, and Pathogen Stress Shape the Tomato Rhizobacterial Community

Jian Ling, Chun‐Yang Pan, Zhenchuan Mao, Xingzhong Liu, Meichun Xiang, Bingyan Xie, Xingxing Ping, Yan Li, Jianlong Zhao, Yao Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Although the effects of soil type, plant genotype, and pathogen invasion on plant rhizosphere microbiomes have been preliminarily explored, their relative contributions and interactive influences on rhizobacterial community assembly remain unclear. In this study, we used tomato as a model to evaluate the individual and combined impacts of these three factors on rhizosphere bacterial community structure and function within a unified experimental framework. Microbiome-based analyses revealed that soil type was the predominant driver, explaining 53.1% of structural and 49.6% of functional variation, followed by tomato genotype (15.6% and 36.1%, respectively) and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol) inoculation (2.1% and 0.9%). Notably, the interaction between soil type and tomato genotype exerted a stronger influence than any other factor combination. Total nitrogen emerged as the key abiotic factor shaping the taxonomic composition of rhizobacterial communities, whereas soil pH played a dominant role in determining their functional profiles. Distinct tomato genotypes harbored rhizobacterial communities with divergent taxonomic and functional compositions. Although pathogen inoculation triggered the recruitment of beneficial microbes by the host plants, its impact on rhizobacterial community assembly was considerably weaker compared with the effects of soil type and tomato genotype. These findings provide a framework for understanding how soil, host, and pathogen collectively shape rhizobacterial communities and offer insights for optimizing microbiome management in crop production.

AgronomyVol. 15(11)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Nankai University (CN), Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine (CN), Institute of Vegetables and Flowers (CN), Institute of Microbiology (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
Nankai University
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
3.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.