Nanosilica-Based Hybrid Hydrophobic Coatings for Stone Heritage Conservation: An Overview

Hybrid hydrophobic coatings (HHCs), which combine organic and inorganic materials, have demonstrated superior weathering resistance compared to conventional organic coatings in conserving stone heritage structures. Among the inorganic components of HHCs, nanosilica is especially promising because of its ability to form durable, weathering-resistant and hydrophobic silane-based structures. This overview examined recent studies, advances, and emerging trends about nanosilica-based HHCs from 2020 to 2024 using the “Boolean strategy” and search terms “stone”, “heritage”, “hydrophobic”, and “coating”, capturing 5244 articles. After screening for titles containing “nanosilica” (470 items remained), excluding works related to “consolidants” and “cement” (171 items remained), and requiring quantitative data on formulations, methods, and performance of nanosilica-based HHCs in stone heritage structures, 16 relevant works were identified. China and Italy dominated research works on nanosilica-based HHC development, which was applied to stone heritage structures composed of carbonate materials (e.g., limestone, dolomite, and Palazzolo carbonates) and silica-rich materials (e.g., Qingshi stone, Hedishi stone, and red sandstone). Key evaluation metrics reported by multiple authors to evaluate HHC efficacy included water contact angle (WCA), total color difference (TCD), and solution pH. Moreover, ultraviolet light (UV) durability, thermomechanical stability, biocidal efficiency, and graffiti protection were achieved when nanosilica was combined with other nanomaterials. Integrating emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), internet-of-things (IoT), and smartphones with colorimeter apps could improve accessibility, real-time monitoring and reliability of HHC testing, while adherence to standardized testing protocols would further enhance comparability and practical application across studies. Overall, this overview provides valuable insights into nanosilica-based HHCs for researchers and restorers/conservators of stone heritage structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerals
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/min15111134
Primary Topic
Building materials and conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nanosilica-Based Hybrid Hydrophobic Coatings for Stone Heritage Conservation: An Overview

Theerayut Phengsaart, Marthias Silwamba, Arnold C. Alguno, Carlito Baltazar Tabelin et al.
Minerals
Building materials and conservation
article

Nanosilica-Based Hybrid Hydrophobic Coatings for Stone Heritage Conservation: An Overview

Theerayut Phengsaart, Marthias Silwamba, Arnold C. Alguno, Carlito Baltazar Tabelin, Mylah Villacorte-Tabelin, Ariel G. Bongabong, Raul Lucero, Kent Benedict Salisid, Reymarvelos Oros
article en

Abstract

Hybrid hydrophobic coatings (HHCs), which combine organic and inorganic materials, have demonstrated superior weathering resistance compared to conventional organic coatings in conserving stone heritage structures. Among the inorganic components of HHCs, nanosilica is especially promising because of its ability to form durable, weathering-resistant and hydrophobic silane-based structures. This overview examined recent studies, advances, and emerging trends about nanosilica-based HHCs from 2020 to 2024 using the “Boolean strategy” and search terms “stone”, “heritage”, “hydrophobic”, and “coating”, capturing 5244 articles. After screening for titles containing “nanosilica” (470 items remained), excluding works related to “consolidants” and “cement” (171 items remained), and requiring quantitative data on formulations, methods, and performance of nanosilica-based HHCs in stone heritage structures, 16 relevant works were identified. China and Italy dominated research works on nanosilica-based HHC development, which was applied to stone heritage structures composed of carbonate materials (e.g., limestone, dolomite, and Palazzolo carbonates) and silica-rich materials (e.g., Qingshi stone, Hedishi stone, and red sandstone). Key evaluation metrics reported by multiple authors to evaluate HHC efficacy included water contact angle (WCA), total color difference (TCD), and solution pH. Moreover, ultraviolet light (UV) durability, thermomechanical stability, biocidal efficiency, and graffiti protection were achieved when nanosilica was combined with other nanomaterials. Integrating emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), internet-of-things (IoT), and smartphones with colorimeter apps could improve accessibility, real-time monitoring and reliability of HHC testing, while adherence to standardized testing protocols would further enhance comparability and practical application across studies. Overall, this overview provides valuable insights into nanosilica-based HHCs for researchers and restorers/conservators of stone heritage structures.

MineralsVol. 15(11)
Chulalongkorn University (TH), Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology (PH), University of Zambia (ZM)
Iligan Institute of Technology, Mindanao State University, Philippine Council for Industry, Energy, and Emerging Technology Research and Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Building materials and conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.