AGI imagined: how is AGI configured by the theories of mind

Abstract AI (Artificial Intelligence) is a rapidly evolving field with profound implications for the future. As several companies race to achieve AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), this pursuit could dramatically impact humanity. On one hand, AGI holds the promise of helping humanity envision and create a better future. On the other hand, it raises significant ethical and practical threats. This dichotomy presents a dilemma, further influenced by human origins that are fundamentally shaping the AI and AGI development. In this article, we explore the origins of AGI and how they shape the emergence of fundamentally different kinds of AGI, each with distinct characteristics and varying implications for human-AGI interaction . The transition from AI to AGI is deeply influenced by human perspectives on the nature of thought and action, often referenced as “Theories of Mind”. This perspective significantly impacts both the nature and content of AGI. Given the complexity and variance of these views, it is essential to understand their implications upon the characteristics of AGI that will result from the use of each theory. We examined two prominent theoretical frameworks that represent contrasting perspectives on the nature of cognition: Computation theory, which is widely regarded as the dominant model for explaining cognitive functioning, and Embodied Cognition theory, which challenges the computational paradigm by emphasizing the role of the body and environment in shaping cognition. Our analysis highlights both the fundamental differences between these theories and the need for their integration into a more comprehensive unified perspective. By analyzing these theories and projecting the forms of AGI they are likely to produce, we demonstrate how they lead to fundamentally different models of AGI, and potentially—to drastically different expressions of human thought. We suggest a reconciliation of these theoretical differences by uniting their best qualities, thereby enabling the development of a more socially attuned AGI that aligns more closely to human values and norms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02717-9
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AGI imagined: how is AGI configured by the theories of mind

Boaz Tamir, Jacob Zilberman
AI & Society
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

AGI imagined: how is AGI configured by the theories of mind

Boaz Tamir, Jacob Zilberman
article en

Abstract

Abstract AI (Artificial Intelligence) is a rapidly evolving field with profound implications for the future. As several companies race to achieve AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), this pursuit could dramatically impact humanity. On one hand, AGI holds the promise of helping humanity envision and create a better future. On the other hand, it raises significant ethical and practical threats. This dichotomy presents a dilemma, further influenced by human origins that are fundamentally shaping the AI and AGI development. In this article, we explore the origins of AGI and how they shape the emergence of fundamentally different kinds of AGI, each with distinct characteristics and varying implications for human-AGI interaction . The transition from AI to AGI is deeply influenced by human perspectives on the nature of thought and action, often referenced as “Theories of Mind”. This perspective significantly impacts both the nature and content of AGI. Given the complexity and variance of these views, it is essential to understand their implications upon the characteristics of AGI that will result from the use of each theory. We examined two prominent theoretical frameworks that represent contrasting perspectives on the nature of cognition: Computation theory, which is widely regarded as the dominant model for explaining cognitive functioning, and Embodied Cognition theory, which challenges the computational paradigm by emphasizing the role of the body and environment in shaping cognition. Our analysis highlights both the fundamental differences between these theories and the need for their integration into a more comprehensive unified perspective. By analyzing these theories and projecting the forms of AGI they are likely to produce, we demonstrate how they lead to fundamentally different models of AGI, and potentially—to drastically different expressions of human thought. We suggest a reconciliation of these theoretical differences by uniting their best qualities, thereby enabling the development of a more socially attuned AGI that aligns more closely to human values and norms.

AI & Society
Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AGI imagined: how is AGI configured by the theories of mind — Boaz Tamir, Jacob Zilberman · AI & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS