Validity of a ramp protocol based on whole-body climbing-specific exercise for peak oxygen uptake in physically active adults

The present study aimed to verify the validity of peak oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O<sub>2peak</sub>) between climbing-specific walking (CLIMIT) and cycling tests in physically active adults. A total of 101 physically active adults participated in this study. Participants were randomly assigned to either cycling or CLIMIT test. The cycling test included an initial period of 2 min at a constant load of 50 watts. The workload was increased by 25 watts every 30 s. During the CLIMIT test, an initial period of 2 min at a constant step length (SL) of 18 cm, a step frequency (SF) of 80·min<sup>-1</sup>, and a viscous intensity (VI) of 100 F*v·min<sup>-1</sup>. SL and VI were increased by 2 cm and 50 F*v·min<sup>-1</sup> every 30 s, respectively. SF was reduced only by 20·min<sup>-1</sup> until the end of the test. Pearson's correlations of [Formula: see text]O<sub>2peak</sub>, physiological variables, and energetic contributions were determined during both tests. Cycling and CLIMIT tests showed strong interclass correlations, acceptable biases, and narrow 95% limits of agreement of [Formula: see text]O<sub>2peak</sub>. Strong relationships of physiological variables and energetic contributions between both tests were observed. The CLIMIT test and [Formula: see text]O<sub>2peak</sub> showed a high validity. This may lead to another useful exercise for cardiovascular/-metabolic tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-23438-5
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity of a ramp protocol based on whole-body climbing-specific exercise for peak oxygen uptake in physically active adults

Woo‐Hwi Yang, Zi-Hyun Kim, Jun-Young Baek, Sebastian Gehlert et al.
Scientific Reports
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Validity of a ramp protocol based on whole-body climbing-specific exercise for peak oxygen uptake in physically active adults

Woo‐Hwi Yang, Zi-Hyun Kim, Jun-Young Baek, Sebastian Gehlert, Oliver Heine, Yong-Jun Cha, Hyung Yun Choi, Young-Je Kwak, Soyoung Park
article en

Abstract

The present study aimed to verify the validity of peak oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O<sub>2peak</sub>) between climbing-specific walking (CLIMIT) and cycling tests in physically active adults. A total of 101 physically active adults participated in this study. Participants were randomly assigned to either cycling or CLIMIT test. The cycling test included an initial period of 2 min at a constant load of 50 watts. The workload was increased by 25 watts every 30 s. During the CLIMIT test, an initial period of 2 min at a constant step length (SL) of 18 cm, a step frequency (SF) of 80·min<sup>-1</sup>, and a viscous intensity (VI) of 100 F*v·min<sup>-1</sup>. SL and VI were increased by 2 cm and 50 F*v·min<sup>-1</sup> every 30 s, respectively. SF was reduced only by 20·min<sup>-1</sup> until the end of the test. Pearson's correlations of [Formula: see text]O<sub>2peak</sub>, physiological variables, and energetic contributions were determined during both tests. Cycling and CLIMIT tests showed strong interclass correlations, acceptable biases, and narrow 95% limits of agreement of [Formula: see text]O<sub>2peak</sub>. Strong relationships of physiological variables and energetic contributions between both tests were observed. The CLIMIT test and [Formula: see text]O<sub>2peak</sub> showed a high validity. This may lead to another useful exercise for cardiovascular/-metabolic tests.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
German Sport University Cologne (DE), University of Hildesheim (DE), CHA University Bundang Medical Center (KR), Busan TechnoPark (KR), CHA University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.