REPLACING A MECHANISTIC BLOOD COAGULATION MODEL WITH MACHINE LEARNING: A BENCHMARK STUDY FOR ACCELERATED THROMBOTIC RISK PREDICTION

Recurrent venous thromboembolism (RVTE) is a major clinical concern due to its high recurrence rate and complex, patient-specific pathophysiology. Recently, hybrid models that integrate clinical data with mechanistic simulations have shown promise in improving risk prediction. One such approach combines artificial neural networks (ANNs) with a system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) that simulates the biochemical cascade of thrombin generation. However, this hybrid model presents two major limitations: it is not differentiable end-to-end due to the embedded ODE solver, and the numerical integration of stiff ODEs during optimization is computationally expensive. These limitations hinder model scalability and real-time applicability in clinical settings. This study aims to accelerate and simplify thrombotic risk modeling by replacing the mechanistic ODE system with data-driven machine learning (ML) models. Specifically, it benchmarks the performance of different ML regressors as surrogates for the ODE system within the optimization of an ANN-based hybrid model for RVTE prediction. Data from 235 patients with a first episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE) were used. The original hybrid model mapped 39 clinical and hematological variables to eight sensitive kinetic parameters via a multilayer perceptron (MLP). These parameters were then input into a system of ODEs to simulate patient-specific thrombin generation and compute the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), a key biomarker for RVTE classification. In this work, the ODE solver was replaced with ML regressors trained to approximate ETP outputs directly from the kinetic parameters. Ten ML models were evaluated as ODE surrogates, including ANN, Gaussian process regression, support vector regression, random forest, and gradient boosting. Each surrogate was integrated into the optimization pipeline and benchmarked across 192 configurations using eight metaheuristic optimization algorithms (MOAs), including Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Genetic Algorithm, and Particle Swarm Optimization. Metrics included AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and optimization accuracy. Replacing the ODE system with machine learning surrogates significantly improved optimization efficiency without compromising performance. The ANN-based surrogate model, combined with the Grey Wolf Optimizer (ANN–Surrogate–GWO), achieved an AUC of 0.89, true positive rate of 0.93, and true negative rate of 0.89 on the test set. This approach reached 97.97% relative accuracy on the optimization objective and reduced computation time by over 95%, while preserving the physiological relationship between kinetic parameters and thrombin dynamics, enabling faster and more reliable RVTE risk prediction. This work demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of replacing computationally intensive mechanistic ODE models of the blood coagulation cascade with machine learning surrogates for clinical prediction tasks. By preserving the physiological mapping from kinetic parameters to thrombin potential, the surrogate approach maintains interpretability while drastically accelerating optimization. The ANN–Surrogate– GWO configuration emerged as a clinically viable and computationally efficient alternative for RVTE risk prediction. These findings suggest that ML-based emulators of mechanistic models offer a scalable path forward for biomedical modeling, enabling broader integration into real-time, patient-specific decision support systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hematology Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2025.105187
Primary Topic
Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

REPLACING A MECHANISTIC BLOOD COAGULATION MODEL WITH MACHINE LEARNING: A BENCHMARK STUDY FOR ACCELERATED THROMBOTIC RISK PREDICTION

JM Annichino-Bizzacchi, SAL Montalvão, MA Bannoud, TD Martins et al.
Hematology Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
article

REPLACING A MECHANISTIC BLOOD COAGULATION MODEL WITH MACHINE LEARNING: A BENCHMARK STUDY FOR ACCELERATED THROMBOTIC RISK PREDICTION

JM Annichino-Bizzacchi, SAL Montalvão, MA Bannoud, TD Martins, RM Filho, MRW Maciel
article en

Abstract

Recurrent venous thromboembolism (RVTE) is a major clinical concern due to its high recurrence rate and complex, patient-specific pathophysiology. Recently, hybrid models that integrate clinical data with mechanistic simulations have shown promise in improving risk prediction. One such approach combines artificial neural networks (ANNs) with a system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) that simulates the biochemical cascade of thrombin generation. However, this hybrid model presents two major limitations: it is not differentiable end-to-end due to the embedded ODE solver, and the numerical integration of stiff ODEs during optimization is computationally expensive. These limitations hinder model scalability and real-time applicability in clinical settings. This study aims to accelerate and simplify thrombotic risk modeling by replacing the mechanistic ODE system with data-driven machine learning (ML) models. Specifically, it benchmarks the performance of different ML regressors as surrogates for the ODE system within the optimization of an ANN-based hybrid model for RVTE prediction. Data from 235 patients with a first episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE) were used. The original hybrid model mapped 39 clinical and hematological variables to eight sensitive kinetic parameters via a multilayer perceptron (MLP). These parameters were then input into a system of ODEs to simulate patient-specific thrombin generation and compute the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), a key biomarker for RVTE classification. In this work, the ODE solver was replaced with ML regressors trained to approximate ETP outputs directly from the kinetic parameters. Ten ML models were evaluated as ODE surrogates, including ANN, Gaussian process regression, support vector regression, random forest, and gradient boosting. Each surrogate was integrated into the optimization pipeline and benchmarked across 192 configurations using eight metaheuristic optimization algorithms (MOAs), including Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Genetic Algorithm, and Particle Swarm Optimization. Metrics included AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and optimization accuracy. Replacing the ODE system with machine learning surrogates significantly improved optimization efficiency without compromising performance. The ANN-based surrogate model, combined with the Grey Wolf Optimizer (ANN–Surrogate–GWO), achieved an AUC of 0.89, true positive rate of 0.93, and true negative rate of 0.89 on the test set. This approach reached 97.97% relative accuracy on the optimization objective and reduced computation time by over 95%, while preserving the physiological relationship between kinetic parameters and thrombin dynamics, enabling faster and more reliable RVTE risk prediction. This work demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of replacing computationally intensive mechanistic ODE models of the blood coagulation cascade with machine learning surrogates for clinical prediction tasks. By preserving the physiological mapping from kinetic parameters to thrombin potential, the surrogate approach maintains interpretability while drastically accelerating optimization. The ANN–Surrogate– GWO configuration emerged as a clinically viable and computationally efficient alternative for RVTE risk prediction. These findings suggest that ML-based emulators of mechanistic models offer a scalable path forward for biomedical modeling, enabling broader integration into real-time, patient-specific decision support systems.

Hematology Transfusion and Cell TherapyVol. 47
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.