ASSESSMENT OF HTLV-1/2 INFECTION STATUS IN BLOOD DONORS: AN OPTIMIZED DETECTION APPROACH

Serological screening in blood banks is a crucial step to ensure transfusion safety by preventing the transmission of infectious agents to recipients. Among the pathogens screened, human T-cell lymphotropic virus types 1 and 2 (HTLV-1/2) are included due to their potential for transfusion transmission and their possible association with neurological and hematological conditions, such as Tropical Spastic Paraparesis/HTLV-1-Associated Myelopathy (TSP/HAM) and adult T-cell Leukemia/Lymphoma (ATLL). Although the immunoassays employed in initial screening are highly sensitive, they may yield false-positive results, which can lead to the unnecessary exclusion of eligible donors, increased psychological burden, and higher costs due to confirmatory testing. Therefore, evaluating the frequency and underlying factors associated with false-positive HTLV-1/2 results is essential for refining screening strategies that balance transfusion safety with donor retention. This study aimed to determine the optimal Signal-to-Cutoff (S/CO) threshold in a chemiluminescent immunoassay to improve the discrimination of true HTLV-1/2 positivity in blood donors. A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 220,340 donations, among which 407 samples (0.18%) were initially reactive for anti-HTLV-1/2 antibodies using a chemiluminescent immunoassay. Of these, 223 samples (55.0%) were available for further evaluation with a confirmatory assay (Inno-Lia HTLV-1/2–Fujirebio®) and real-time PCR. A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to identify the optimal cutoff point. Among the 223 retested samples, 63 (28.3%) were confirmed positive, 112 (50.0%) were negative, and 48 (21.7%) had indeterminate results by confirmatory testing. HTLV DNA was detected in 56 (25.1%) samples by real-time PCR. ROC curve analysis indicated that a S/CO ratio ≥ 4.0 provided the best discriminatory power, increasing the positive predictive value (PPV) from 47.6% to 66.1%. Adjusting the S/CO threshold ≥ 4.0 in chemiluminescent immunoassays significantly enhances the accuracy of HTLV-1/2 screening in blood donors. This refinement reduces false-positives rates, prevents unnecessary discard of blood components, and optimizes the donor counseling and notification process. The implementation of evidence-based cut-off adjustments contributes to enhance transfusion safety, especially in low-prevalence settings, such as blood banks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hematology Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2025.105802
Primary Topic
T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ASSESSMENT OF HTLV-1/2 INFECTION STATUS IN BLOOD DONORS: AN OPTIMIZED DETECTION APPROACH

C Almeida-Neto, Kelly das Graças Fernandes Dantas, Cristian Gollo de Oliveira, VITÓRIA ISMAEL ROCHA et al.
Hematology Transfusion and Cell Therapy
T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
article

ASSESSMENT OF HTLV-1/2 INFECTION STATUS IN BLOOD DONORS: AN OPTIMIZED DETECTION APPROACH

C Almeida-Neto, Kelly das Graças Fernandes Dantas, Cristian Gollo de Oliveira, VITÓRIA ISMAEL ROCHA, AS Nishiya, A. Mendrone-Jr, JE Ferreira, NA Salles, Suzete C. Ferreira
article en

Abstract

Serological screening in blood banks is a crucial step to ensure transfusion safety by preventing the transmission of infectious agents to recipients. Among the pathogens screened, human T-cell lymphotropic virus types 1 and 2 (HTLV-1/2) are included due to their potential for transfusion transmission and their possible association with neurological and hematological conditions, such as Tropical Spastic Paraparesis/HTLV-1-Associated Myelopathy (TSP/HAM) and adult T-cell Leukemia/Lymphoma (ATLL). Although the immunoassays employed in initial screening are highly sensitive, they may yield false-positive results, which can lead to the unnecessary exclusion of eligible donors, increased psychological burden, and higher costs due to confirmatory testing. Therefore, evaluating the frequency and underlying factors associated with false-positive HTLV-1/2 results is essential for refining screening strategies that balance transfusion safety with donor retention. This study aimed to determine the optimal Signal-to-Cutoff (S/CO) threshold in a chemiluminescent immunoassay to improve the discrimination of true HTLV-1/2 positivity in blood donors. A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 220,340 donations, among which 407 samples (0.18%) were initially reactive for anti-HTLV-1/2 antibodies using a chemiluminescent immunoassay. Of these, 223 samples (55.0%) were available for further evaluation with a confirmatory assay (Inno-Lia HTLV-1/2–Fujirebio®) and real-time PCR. A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to identify the optimal cutoff point. Among the 223 retested samples, 63 (28.3%) were confirmed positive, 112 (50.0%) were negative, and 48 (21.7%) had indeterminate results by confirmatory testing. HTLV DNA was detected in 56 (25.1%) samples by real-time PCR. ROC curve analysis indicated that a S/CO ratio ≥ 4.0 provided the best discriminatory power, increasing the positive predictive value (PPV) from 47.6% to 66.1%. Adjusting the S/CO threshold ≥ 4.0 in chemiluminescent immunoassays significantly enhances the accuracy of HTLV-1/2 screening in blood donors. This refinement reduces false-positives rates, prevents unnecessary discard of blood components, and optimizes the donor counseling and notification process. The implementation of evidence-based cut-off adjustments contributes to enhance transfusion safety, especially in low-prevalence settings, such as blood banks.

Hematology Transfusion and Cell TherapyVol. 47
Instituto Adolfo Lutz (BR), Federal University of São João del-Rei (BR), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Fundação Pró-Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.