Research Burden in the Portuguese Residency Program: Cardiology’s Unique Challenge

This study analyses the research output expected for the final curricular evaluation of Portuguese medical residency programs, with particular focus on cardiology. All publicly available specialty-specific evaluation grids were reviewed in December 2024. Cardiology required 46 research items to attain maximum scoring, including research papers and congress abstracts stratified by journal quartile. This was the highest requirement among all specialties, compared to a median of 11 across all specialties. Uniquely, cardiology was the only specialty to quantitatively specify participation in research projects, clinical trials, and registries. In contrast, it scored below average in the most recent national residency satisfaction survey. However, no significant correlation was observed between the number of required research items and overall satisfaction. These findings suggest a potential misalignment between curricular evaluation criteria and the actual conditions of residency training. Reviewing these requirements may help create a more balanced and sustainable training environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Médica Portuguesa
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.23626
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research Burden in the Portuguese Residency Program: Cardiology’s Unique Challenge

G Costa, J Presume, Diogo Santos‐Ferreira, Pedro Azevedo et al.
Acta Médica Portuguesa
Health and Medical Research Impacts
article

Research Burden in the Portuguese Residency Program: Cardiology’s Unique Challenge

G Costa, J Presume, Diogo Santos‐Ferreira, Pedro Azevedo, Fernando Montenegro Sá, José Durão, Vanda Devesa Neto
article en

Abstract

This study analyses the research output expected for the final curricular evaluation of Portuguese medical residency programs, with particular focus on cardiology. All publicly available specialty-specific evaluation grids were reviewed in December 2024. Cardiology required 46 research items to attain maximum scoring, including research papers and congress abstracts stratified by journal quartile. This was the highest requirement among all specialties, compared to a median of 11 across all specialties. Uniquely, cardiology was the only specialty to quantitatively specify participation in research projects, clinical trials, and registries. In contrast, it scored below average in the most recent national residency satisfaction survey. However, no significant correlation was observed between the number of required research items and overall satisfaction. These findings suggest a potential misalignment between curricular evaluation criteria and the actual conditions of residency training. Reviewing these requirements may help create a more balanced and sustainable training environment.

Acta Médica PortuguesaVol. 39(1)
Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia (PT), Câmara Municipal de Almada (PT), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Francisco Gentil (PT), Ordem dos Médicos (PT), University of Coimbra (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.