Identifying Key Predictors of Change in a Social Norms Campaign to Reduce Bullying and Sexual Harassment

Abstract Social norms campaigns have been used as an intervention to address common concerns, such as bullying and sexual harassment, in high schools. While there is promise for their use, there have been mixed results in terms of creating change in students’ attitudes, and there is scant evidence about variables that may contribute to these outcomes. Based on a sample of 359 students (82% White, 53% Female) from a suburban high school in the Northeastern United Stated participating in the pilot of a social norms campaign to reduce bullying and sexual harassment, this study examined whether acceptability of, believability of, and exposure to campaign messages contributed to changes in individuals’ perceptions of their peers’ attitudes. Believability and acceptability of the campaign were significant predictors of change, with students who reported greater campaign believability and acceptability also reporting greater levels of change in their perceptions of their peers at post-test. White students and straight students showed greater change in their perceived peer norms compared with their non-White and sexual minority (SM) peers. This study highlights the importance of student input in the development of campaigns, particularly in taking measures to improve students’ perceptions of believability and acceptability of a social norms campaign.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary School Psychology
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-025-00568-1
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Key Predictors of Change in a Social Norms Campaign to Reduce Bullying and Sexual Harassment

Jennifer A. Livingston, Gina M. Bellavia, Margaret Manges, Thomas Hugh Feeley et al.
Contemporary School Psychology
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
article

Identifying Key Predictors of Change in a Social Norms Campaign to Reduce Bullying and Sexual Harassment

Jennifer A. Livingston, Gina M. Bellavia, Margaret Manges, Thomas Hugh Feeley, Amanda B. Nickerson, Julianna N. Casella, Yingqi Huang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Social norms campaigns have been used as an intervention to address common concerns, such as bullying and sexual harassment, in high schools. While there is promise for their use, there have been mixed results in terms of creating change in students’ attitudes, and there is scant evidence about variables that may contribute to these outcomes. Based on a sample of 359 students (82% White, 53% Female) from a suburban high school in the Northeastern United Stated participating in the pilot of a social norms campaign to reduce bullying and sexual harassment, this study examined whether acceptability of, believability of, and exposure to campaign messages contributed to changes in individuals’ perceptions of their peers’ attitudes. Believability and acceptability of the campaign were significant predictors of change, with students who reported greater campaign believability and acceptability also reporting greater levels of change in their perceptions of their peers at post-test. White students and straight students showed greater change in their perceived peer norms compared with their non-White and sexual minority (SM) peers. This study highlights the importance of student input in the development of campaigns, particularly in taking measures to improve students’ perceptions of believability and acceptability of a social norms campaign.

Contemporary School PsychologyVol. 30(1)
Buffalo State University (US), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, University at Buffalo
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.