When Does Sharing Cost Too Much? Peer Presence and Resource Acquisition in Young Children

This research used three sequential experiments to examine how peer social relationships (classroom belongingness and intimacy level), relative age (one-year-younger, same-age, one-year-older), and resource acquisition method (effort-based, random) influence high-cost sharing among Chinese children aged 4 to 6. Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 256, 128 boys) served as a foundational study, testing how classroom belongingness (same class, different class) and intimacy (high, low) in peer presence affect high-cost sharing. Results showed that 4- to 5-year-olds were more likely to share with high-intimacy peers, while 5- to 6-year-olds were more sensitive to same-class peers, suggesting a developmental shift toward classroom identity. Building on these findings, study 2 (<i>N</i> = 96, 48 boys) examined 5- to 6-year-olds in mixed-age classes, controlling for high familiarity and same-class peer presence. The presence of one-year-older peers significantly increased sharing, revealing a hierarchical age effect. Study 3 (<i>N</i> = 128, 64 boys) further examined the interaction between resource acquisition method and relative age. Effort-based acquisition reduced sharing, but one-year-older peer presence mitigated this effect. Findings indicate a developmental transition from intimacy driven sharing in younger children (4- to 5-year-olds) to classroom belongingness and relative age sensitive sharing in older children (5- to 6-year-olds), and show that the interaction between relative age and shared resource acquisition method critically shapes high cost sharing behavior in this age range.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Genetic Psychology
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2025.2571903
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Does Sharing Cost Too Much? Peer Presence and Resource Acquisition in Young Children

X Liu, Gao Jian
The Journal of Genetic Psychology
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
article

When Does Sharing Cost Too Much? Peer Presence and Resource Acquisition in Young Children

X Liu, Gao Jian
article en

Abstract

This research used three sequential experiments to examine how peer social relationships (classroom belongingness and intimacy level), relative age (one-year-younger, same-age, one-year-older), and resource acquisition method (effort-based, random) influence high-cost sharing among Chinese children aged 4 to 6. Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 256, 128 boys) served as a foundational study, testing how classroom belongingness (same class, different class) and intimacy (high, low) in peer presence affect high-cost sharing. Results showed that 4- to 5-year-olds were more likely to share with high-intimacy peers, while 5- to 6-year-olds were more sensitive to same-class peers, suggesting a developmental shift toward classroom identity. Building on these findings, study 2 (<i>N</i> = 96, 48 boys) examined 5- to 6-year-olds in mixed-age classes, controlling for high familiarity and same-class peer presence. The presence of one-year-older peers significantly increased sharing, revealing a hierarchical age effect. Study 3 (<i>N</i> = 128, 64 boys) further examined the interaction between resource acquisition method and relative age. Effort-based acquisition reduced sharing, but one-year-older peer presence mitigated this effect. Findings indicate a developmental transition from intimacy driven sharing in younger children (4- to 5-year-olds) to classroom belongingness and relative age sensitive sharing in older children (5- to 6-year-olds), and show that the interaction between relative age and shared resource acquisition method critically shapes high cost sharing behavior in this age range.

The Journal of Genetic Psychology
Hunan Normal University (CN), Shandong Normal University (CN), Changsha Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.