Organizational sustainable artificial intelligence capabilities scale development, validation, and implications

As artificial intelligence (AI) adoption accelerates globally, its sustainability implications remain insufficiently integrated into organizational capability frameworks. This study develops and validates the organizational sustainable AI capabilities (OSAIC) construct, extending dynamic capabilities theory by embedding sustainability as a meta-capability in AI governance and innovation processes. OSAIC is conceptualized as a five-dimensional, reflective, higher-order construct, encompassing sustainable AI learning, seizing, sensing, stakeholder integration, and transformation. A multi-phase scale development procedure—including expert Q-sorting, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis, using partial least squares structural equation modeling—was employed. The scale was assessed and validated using two distinct samples: a pilot study ( n = 188) and a main study ( n = 364), both comprising managers from diverse industries and regions. The findings indicated robust psychometric attributes, characterized by substantial reliability, convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity. A positive and significant relationship between OSAIC and sustainable innovation indicated nomological validity, addressing the AI sustainability paradox by illustrating that sustainability-oriented AI capabilities enhance rather than constrain innovation. By extending the research on dynamic capabilities and paradoxes and presenting a validated measurement tool, this study contributes theoretically and methodologically, respectively, to the literature. Practically, it offers managers a diagnostic framework to align AI implementation with environmental and social accountability while fostering innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100863
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organizational sustainable artificial intelligence capabilities scale development, validation, and implications

Sikandar Ali Qalati, Faiza Siddiqui
1 citations
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Organizational sustainable artificial intelligence capabilities scale development, validation, and implications

Sikandar Ali Qalati, Faiza Siddiqui
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) adoption accelerates globally, its sustainability implications remain insufficiently integrated into organizational capability frameworks. This study develops and validates the organizational sustainable AI capabilities (OSAIC) construct, extending dynamic capabilities theory by embedding sustainability as a meta-capability in AI governance and innovation processes. OSAIC is conceptualized as a five-dimensional, reflective, higher-order construct, encompassing sustainable AI learning, seizing, sensing, stakeholder integration, and transformation. A multi-phase scale development procedure—including expert Q-sorting, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis, using partial least squares structural equation modeling—was employed. The scale was assessed and validated using two distinct samples: a pilot study ( n = 188) and a main study ( n = 364), both comprising managers from diverse industries and regions. The findings indicated robust psychometric attributes, characterized by substantial reliability, convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity. A positive and significant relationship between OSAIC and sustainable innovation indicated nomological validity, addressing the AI sustainability paradox by illustrating that sustainability-oriented AI capabilities enhance rather than constrain innovation. By extending the research on dynamic capabilities and paradoxes and presenting a validated measurement tool, this study contributes theoretically and methodologically, respectively, to the literature. Practically, it offers managers a diagnostic framework to align AI implementation with environmental and social accountability while fostering innovation.

Journal of Innovation & KnowledgeVol. 11
Liaocheng University (CN), Shandong Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Organizational sustainable artificial intelligence capabilities scale development, validation, and implications — Sikandar Ali Qalati, Faiza Siddiqui · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS