Is the Scottish Parliament Working?

This essay critically examines the effectiveness of the Scottish Parliament in fulfilling its role of holding the Scottish Government to account. It evaluates the committee system, chamber debates, parliamentary questions, and public participation, highlighting structural and cultural challenges limiting the Parliament's performance. Despite its unicameral design and ambitions for consensus-driven ‘new politics,’ the Parliament remains constrained by entrenched party discipline, rigid procedures, and limited public engagement. The committee system, intended to provide robust scrutiny and legislative initiative, is overwhelmed by government dominance and high member turnover, restricting expertise and independent inquiry. Chamber debates suffer from restrictive time limits, centralised speaker selection, and lack of parliamentary privilege, resulting in scripted and partisan exchanges. Parliamentary questioning is hindered by early deadlines and rehearsed responses, reducing spontaneity and scrutiny. Public engagement remains weak, hampered by limited digital access and low constituent interaction. To address these shortcomings, the essay proposes reforms: enhancing committee independence and structure, extending and flexibilising debates, revising question procedures, and improving transparency and accessibility. These recommendations aim to realign the Scottish Parliament with its founding aspirations, ensuring it functions as a more effective, participatory, and accountable institution in Scotland's evolving democracy.