Enhancing group lifestyle intervention for depression with ecological momentary assessment: a pilot randomized controlled trial

To investigate the impact of smartphone-delivered ecological momentary assessment (EMA) as a self-monitoring tool to complement a 6-week group face-to-face delivered multicomponent lifestyle medicine (LM) intervention for improving depressive symptoms. 56 Chinese Hong Kong adults with at least a moderate level of depressive symptoms were randomized to the EMA-supported intervention (LM/S; n = 18), pure intervention (PLM; n = 20), or care-as-usual (CAU; n = 18) groups. Data were collected at baseline, immediate post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up. LM/S only showed significantly greater vigorous physical activity than PLM at Week 19. At Week 7, PLM demonstrated a marginal reduction in depressive symptoms and significant improvements in insomnia symptoms, physical health-related quality of life (QoL), overall lifestyle, nutrition, and stress management compared to CAU, while LM/S improved only environmental health-related QoL. At Week 19, both intervention groups showed large improvements in depressive, anxiety, and insomnia symptoms, environmental health-related QoL, overall lifestyle, and stress management compared to CAU. Additional gains were observed for LM/S in nutrition, spiritual growth, and vigorous activity, and for PLM in physical and psychological health-related QoL, and interpersonal relationships. No significant differences in study attrition and intervention attendance were found between groups. Despite a low EMA compliance of 27.1%, the LM/S exhibited a higher, though not significantly different, full intervention adherence rate (66.67%) compared to the PLM (38.89%). A group-based, multicomponent LM intervention could potentially improve depressive symptoms, and smartphone-delivered EMA might enhance full intervention adherence despite modest compliance. A future adequately powered trial is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21688-x
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing group lifestyle intervention for depression with ecological momentary assessment: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Stephanie W. Y. Chan, Nga-Kwan Shi, Vincent Wing-Hei Wong, L. Lee et al.
Scientific Reports
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Enhancing group lifestyle intervention for depression with ecological momentary assessment: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Stephanie W. Y. Chan, Nga-Kwan Shi, Vincent Wing-Hei Wong, L. Lee, Fiona Yan‐Yee Ho, Chee H. Ng, Jerome Sarris
article en

Abstract

To investigate the impact of smartphone-delivered ecological momentary assessment (EMA) as a self-monitoring tool to complement a 6-week group face-to-face delivered multicomponent lifestyle medicine (LM) intervention for improving depressive symptoms. 56 Chinese Hong Kong adults with at least a moderate level of depressive symptoms were randomized to the EMA-supported intervention (LM/S; n = 18), pure intervention (PLM; n = 20), or care-as-usual (CAU; n = 18) groups. Data were collected at baseline, immediate post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up. LM/S only showed significantly greater vigorous physical activity than PLM at Week 19. At Week 7, PLM demonstrated a marginal reduction in depressive symptoms and significant improvements in insomnia symptoms, physical health-related quality of life (QoL), overall lifestyle, nutrition, and stress management compared to CAU, while LM/S improved only environmental health-related QoL. At Week 19, both intervention groups showed large improvements in depressive, anxiety, and insomnia symptoms, environmental health-related QoL, overall lifestyle, and stress management compared to CAU. Additional gains were observed for LM/S in nutrition, spiritual growth, and vigorous activity, and for PLM in physical and psychological health-related QoL, and interpersonal relationships. No significant differences in study attrition and intervention attendance were found between groups. Despite a low EMA compliance of 27.1%, the LM/S exhibited a higher, though not significantly different, full intervention adherence rate (66.67%) compared to the PLM (38.89%). A group-based, multicomponent LM intervention could potentially improve depressive symptoms, and smartphone-delivered EMA might enhance full intervention adherence despite modest compliance. A future adequately powered trial is warranted.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (AU), St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU), Westmead Institute (AU), Melbourne Clinic (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Chinese University of Hong Kong, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.