Progress and regression of seismology over the last 300 years

Since time immemorial, people have attributed the causes of aftershocks, which bring numerous troubles to cities and settlements, to God's punishment for people's sins. The terrible earthquake of November 1, 1755 in Lisbon gave rise to a serious study of earthquake processes, and “thanks” to this catastrophe, geophysics took a huge step forward in the form of numerous scientific papers in the wake of this earthquake and the “cherry on the cake” in the form of the remarkable work of Mr. J. Michell (1760), where the source of the earthquake is not God Punishment, and a seismic wave! The second earthquake that had a significant impact on the development of geophysics was the earthquake in San Francisco on April 18, 1906. Unfortunately, the conclusions of the causes of this disaster, unlike the earthquake in Lisbon, had a negative impact on geophysics in the form of the adoption of Mr. Reid's theory of Elastic recoil, which led science into a dead end, from which geophysicists have not been able to find a way out for more than a hundred years. In this article, made in the style of a historical perspective on the development of geophysics, we will show the progress and regression of the Earth sciences over the past 300 years and reveal the real source of earthquake energy, which was pointed out by the genius W. Stukeley in the distant eighteenth century.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Environment
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-025-00424-2
Primary Topic
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Progress and regression of seismology over the last 300 years

Serguei Bychkov
Discover Environment
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
article

Progress and regression of seismology over the last 300 years

Serguei Bychkov
article en

Abstract

Since time immemorial, people have attributed the causes of aftershocks, which bring numerous troubles to cities and settlements, to God's punishment for people's sins. The terrible earthquake of November 1, 1755 in Lisbon gave rise to a serious study of earthquake processes, and “thanks” to this catastrophe, geophysics took a huge step forward in the form of numerous scientific papers in the wake of this earthquake and the “cherry on the cake” in the form of the remarkable work of Mr. J. Michell (1760), where the source of the earthquake is not God Punishment, and a seismic wave! The second earthquake that had a significant impact on the development of geophysics was the earthquake in San Francisco on April 18, 1906. Unfortunately, the conclusions of the causes of this disaster, unlike the earthquake in Lisbon, had a negative impact on geophysics in the form of the adoption of Mr. Reid's theory of Elastic recoil, which led science into a dead end, from which geophysicists have not been able to find a way out for more than a hundred years. In this article, made in the style of a historical perspective on the development of geophysics, we will show the progress and regression of the Earth sciences over the past 300 years and reveal the real source of earthquake energy, which was pointed out by the genius W. Stukeley in the distant eighteenth century.

Discover EnvironmentVol. 3(1)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.