Physical, Cognitive, and Emotional Responses and Their Interrelated Effects on Human–Robot Team Performance in Construction

Although human–robot collaboration (HRC) is anticipated to improve construction productivity, the physical, cognitive, and emotional responses of collaborating human workers (i.e., coworkers) can be crucial to the productivity of HRC, because they can influence both human performance and human–robot team cohesion. However, the potential changes in coworkers’ physical, cognitive, and emotional responses during HRC still remain unknown in construction. This paper examines the impacts of robots’ parameters, such as movement speed, on physical, cognitive, and emotional responses during HRC for a construction task. Twenty participants collaborated with a robot in a simulated bricklaying task in a lab setting. Their responses were measured by analyzing electrodermal activity (EDA) and electroencephalogram (EEG) signals collected from wearable biosensors. Results demonstrated significant (p<0.05) variations in physical, cognitive, and emotional responses across all participants, which also changed over time and differed among individuals. Additionally, potential trade-offs were identified between fostering desired coworkers’ responses and maximizing team productivity, which presents the need for further analysis to achieve the balance. The findings indicate the need for a comprehensive understanding of coworkers’ responses as potentially crucial determinants that can influence coworkers’ performance, cohesion with robots, and productivity in human–robot teams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-16666
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical, Cognitive, and Emotional Responses and Their Interrelated Effects on Human–Robot Team Performance in Construction

Daeho Kim, Francis Baek, Sang Hyun Lee, Jong-Ryeul Sohn et al.
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Physical, Cognitive, and Emotional Responses and Their Interrelated Effects on Human–Robot Team Performance in Construction

Daeho Kim, Francis Baek, Sang Hyun Lee, Jong-Ryeul Sohn, Juhyeon Bae
article en

Abstract

Although human–robot collaboration (HRC) is anticipated to improve construction productivity, the physical, cognitive, and emotional responses of collaborating human workers (i.e., coworkers) can be crucial to the productivity of HRC, because they can influence both human performance and human–robot team cohesion. However, the potential changes in coworkers’ physical, cognitive, and emotional responses during HRC still remain unknown in construction. This paper examines the impacts of robots’ parameters, such as movement speed, on physical, cognitive, and emotional responses during HRC for a construction task. Twenty participants collaborated with a robot in a simulated bricklaying task in a lab setting. Their responses were measured by analyzing electrodermal activity (EDA) and electroencephalogram (EEG) signals collected from wearable biosensors. Results demonstrated significant (p<0.05) variations in physical, cognitive, and emotional responses across all participants, which also changed over time and differed among individuals. Additionally, potential trade-offs were identified between fostering desired coworkers’ responses and maximizing team productivity, which presents the need for further analysis to achieve the balance. The findings indicate the need for a comprehensive understanding of coworkers’ responses as potentially crucial determinants that can influence coworkers’ performance, cohesion with robots, and productivity in human–robot teams.

Journal of Construction Engineering and ManagementVol. 152(1)
University of Toronto (CA), San Diego State University (US), University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.