Blended PC Peer Review Model: Process and Reflection

The academic peer review system is under increasing pressure due to a growing volume of submissions and a limited pool of available reviewers, resulting in delayed decisions and an uneven distribution of reviewing responsibilities. Building upon the International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) community's earlier experience with a Shadow PC (2021 and 2022) and Junior PC (2023 and 2024), MSR 2025 experimented with a Blended Program Committee (PC) peer review model for its Technical Track. This new model pairs up one Junior PC member with two regular PC members as part of the core review team of a given paper, instead of adding them as an extra reviewer. This paper presents the rationale, implementation, and reflections on the model, including empirical insights from a post-review author survey evaluating the quality and usefulness of reviews. Our findings highlight the potential of a Blended PC to alleviate reviewer shortages, foster inclusivity, and sustain a high-quality peer review process. We offer lessons learned and recommendations to guide future adoption and refinement of the model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3772008.3772013
Primary Topic
Expert finding and Q&A systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blended PC Peer Review Model: Process and Reflection

Nicole Novielli, Olga Baysal, Bram Adams, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn et al.
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
Expert finding and Q&A systems
article

Blended PC Peer Review Model: Process and Reflection

Nicole Novielli, Olga Baysal, Bram Adams, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, Ayushi Rastogi
article en

Abstract

The academic peer review system is under increasing pressure due to a growing volume of submissions and a limited pool of available reviewers, resulting in delayed decisions and an uneven distribution of reviewing responsibilities. Building upon the International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) community's earlier experience with a Shadow PC (2021 and 2022) and Junior PC (2023 and 2024), MSR 2025 experimented with a Blended Program Committee (PC) peer review model for its Technical Track. This new model pairs up one Junior PC member with two regular PC members as part of the core review team of a given paper, instead of adding them as an extra reviewer. This paper presents the rationale, implementation, and reflections on the model, including empirical insights from a post-review author survey evaluating the quality and usefulness of reviews. Our findings highlight the potential of a Blended PC to alleviate reviewer shortages, foster inclusivity, and sustain a high-quality peer review process. We offer lessons learned and recommendations to guide future adoption and refinement of the model.

ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering NotesVol. 50(4)
University of Groningen (NL), Queen's University (CA), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), Monash University (AU), Carleton University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Expert finding and Q&A systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Blended PC Peer Review Model: Process and Reflection — Nicole Novielli, Olga Baysal, et al. · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS