Analyzing Variation in Fronto-Orbital Advancement Coding: Insights From 2569 Cases

This study characterizes national billing practices for temporalis muscle flaps in fronto-orbital advancement (FOA). A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using deidentified data from the Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (PNSQIP), 2016 to 2021. Pediatric patients undergoing FOA were identified by CPT code 21175, and cases were categorized by the presence or absence of additional CPT codes 15732/15733 for temporalis muscle flaps. Perioperative variables included operative time, anesthesia time, length of stay, and primary surgical specialty. Among 2569 FOA cases, 601 (23.4%) included additional temporalis muscle flap codes. Operative time (254 ± 7.8 versus 240.6 ± 4.3 min; P = 0.003) and anesthesia time (369.2 ± 8.9 versus 353.3 ± 4.8 min; P = 0.002) were longer in cases with flap codes, while length of stay did not differ (P = 0.077). Plastic surgeons were listed as the primary specialty in most FOAs (57.2%) and were more likely to include flap codes compared with otolaryngologists (24.6% versus 9.6%; P = 0.013). Nearly one quarter of FOA cases included temporalis muscle flap codes, despite temporalis dissection being inherent to the procedure. This variation reflects differences in billing interpretation rather than operative technique and highlights the need for standardized coding guidelines to ensure transparency and equitable reimbursement in craniofacial surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000012080
Primary Topic
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Variation in Fronto-Orbital Advancement Coding: Insights From 2569 Cases

Nicky Perry, Ashlie A. Elver, Adam B. Fleming, Laura S. Humphries et al.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
article

Analyzing Variation in Fronto-Orbital Advancement Coding: Insights From 2569 Cases

Nicky Perry, Ashlie A. Elver, Adam B. Fleming, Laura S. Humphries, Ian C. Hoppe
article en

Abstract

This study characterizes national billing practices for temporalis muscle flaps in fronto-orbital advancement (FOA). A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using deidentified data from the Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (PNSQIP), 2016 to 2021. Pediatric patients undergoing FOA were identified by CPT code 21175, and cases were categorized by the presence or absence of additional CPT codes 15732/15733 for temporalis muscle flaps. Perioperative variables included operative time, anesthesia time, length of stay, and primary surgical specialty. Among 2569 FOA cases, 601 (23.4%) included additional temporalis muscle flap codes. Operative time (254 ± 7.8 versus 240.6 ± 4.3 min; P = 0.003) and anesthesia time (369.2 ± 8.9 versus 353.3 ± 4.8 min; P = 0.002) were longer in cases with flap codes, while length of stay did not differ (P = 0.077). Plastic surgeons were listed as the primary specialty in most FOAs (57.2%) and were more likely to include flap codes compared with otolaryngologists (24.6% versus 9.6%; P = 0.013). Nearly one quarter of FOA cases included temporalis muscle flap codes, despite temporalis dissection being inherent to the procedure. This variation reflects differences in billing interpretation rather than operative technique and highlights the need for standardized coding guidelines to ensure transparency and equitable reimbursement in craniofacial surgery.

Journal of Craniofacial SurgeryVol. 37(1/2)
Jackson Memorial Hospital (US), University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.