When to Seek Help: Trust-Aware Assistance-Seeking in Human-Supervised Autonomy

Our goal is to model and experimentally assess trust evolution to predict future beliefs and behaviors of human–robot teams in dynamic environments. Research suggests that maintaining an appropriate level of trust among team members in a human–robot team is vital for team success. Indeed, research suggests that trust is a multidimensional and latent entity that relates to past experiences and future actions in a complex manner. Employing a human–robot collaborative task, we model human behavior using Input–Output Hidden Markov Model (IOHMM) and design an optimal assistance-seeking strategy for the robot using a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) framework. In this task, the human partner supervises an autonomous mobile manipulator collecting objects in an environment. The supervisor’s responsibility is to ensure that the robot safely executes its task. The robot can either choose to attempt to autonomously collect the object or seek human assistance. The human supervisor actively monitors the robot’s activities, offering assistance upon request, and intervening if they perceive that the robot may fail. In this setting, human trust is the hidden state, and the primary objective is to optimize team performance. We conduct two sets of human–robot interaction experiments. The data from the first experiment are used to estimate POMDP parameters, which are used to compute an optimal assistance-seeking policy evaluated in the second experiment. The estimated POMDP parameters reveal that, for most participants, human intervention is more probable when trust is low, particularly in high-complexity tasks. Notably, our estimates suggest that the robot’s action of asking for human assistance in high-complexity tasks can positively impact human trust. Our experimental results show that the proposed trust-aware policy results in a better performance as compared to an optimal trust-agnostic policy. By comparing model estimates of human trust, obtained using only behavioral data, with the collected self-reported trust values, we show that model estimates are isomorphic to self-reported responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3773900
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When to Seek Help: Trust-Aware Assistance-Seeking in Human-Supervised Autonomy

Ericka Rovira, Vaibhav Srivastava, Dong Hae Mangalindan
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

When to Seek Help: Trust-Aware Assistance-Seeking in Human-Supervised Autonomy

Ericka Rovira, Vaibhav Srivastava, Dong Hae Mangalindan
article en

Abstract

Our goal is to model and experimentally assess trust evolution to predict future beliefs and behaviors of human–robot teams in dynamic environments. Research suggests that maintaining an appropriate level of trust among team members in a human–robot team is vital for team success. Indeed, research suggests that trust is a multidimensional and latent entity that relates to past experiences and future actions in a complex manner. Employing a human–robot collaborative task, we model human behavior using Input–Output Hidden Markov Model (IOHMM) and design an optimal assistance-seeking strategy for the robot using a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) framework. In this task, the human partner supervises an autonomous mobile manipulator collecting objects in an environment. The supervisor’s responsibility is to ensure that the robot safely executes its task. The robot can either choose to attempt to autonomously collect the object or seek human assistance. The human supervisor actively monitors the robot’s activities, offering assistance upon request, and intervening if they perceive that the robot may fail. In this setting, human trust is the hidden state, and the primary objective is to optimize team performance. We conduct two sets of human–robot interaction experiments. The data from the first experiment are used to estimate POMDP parameters, which are used to compute an optimal assistance-seeking policy evaluated in the second experiment. The estimated POMDP parameters reveal that, for most participants, human intervention is more probable when trust is low, particularly in high-complexity tasks. Notably, our estimates suggest that the robot’s action of asking for human assistance in high-complexity tasks can positively impact human trust. Our experimental results show that the proposed trust-aware policy results in a better performance as compared to an optimal trust-agnostic policy. By comparing model estimates of human trust, obtained using only behavioral data, with the collected self-reported trust values, we show that model estimates are isomorphic to self-reported responses.

ACM Transactions on Human-Robot InteractionVol. 15(2)
United States Military Academy (US), American Military Academy (PR), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.