Reply to the ‘Comment on “Why there is no evidence that pyridine killed the English crabs”’ by A. Peters, <i>Environ. Sci.: Adv.</i> , 2025, <b>4</b> , DOI: 10.1039/D4VA00420E
We highlight that the commentary by Peters which uses a CREED/CRED risk assessment framework supports the previous government reports that rejected the pyridine hypothesis and considers the previous evidence as unreliable. This reaffirms our conclusions that pyridine didn't kill the Teesside crabs.
Authors
- Alex T. Ford (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5202-546X)
- Crispin Halsall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8007-9756)
- Mark F. Fitzsimons (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6443-6087)
Institutions
- University of Portsmouth (GB)
- Lancaster University (GB)
- University of Plymouth (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Environmental Science Advances
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1039/d5va00302d
- Primary Topic
- Risk Perception and Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00