The role of genotyping in measuring improved variety adoption and impact: advances, challenges, and policy directions

• Genotyping provides a more reliable and rigorous method to track adoption and impact of improved varieties. • Genotyping shows major mismatches compared to farmer-reported varieties. • Farmers’ misperceptions of varieties drive input misallocations and productivity gaps. • Success of genotyping for adoption studies depends on several enabling conditions. • This review highlights how methods and data quality shape adoption evidence for policy. Accurate measurement of agricultural technology adoption is critical for evaluating the effectiveness of investments in agricultural research and development. While household surveys have long served as the primary tool for tracking varietal adoption, growing evidence reveals systematic mismatches between self-reported and DNA verified varietal identity. These mismatches arise from distinct local and scientific varietal nomenclatures, complex seed systems, and high varietal release rates. This review examines the emerging role of genotyping, particularly DNA fingerprinting, as a complementary method for varietal identification and adoption measurement. Drawing on a growing body of studies across crops and geographies, we assess how DNA fingerprinting alters adoption estimates, reveals patterns of varietal misclassification, and enhances our understanding of seed system performance. We identify critical design considerations for implementing DNA fingerprinting at scale, including sampling strategies, reference library construction, and integration with standard household surveys. The review also highlights methodological innovations to reduce DNA fingerprinting costs and explores how fingerprinting can inform monitoring, evaluation, and scaling of agricultural innovations. Finally, we outline key research and policy priorities to mainstream DNA fingerprinting into national agricultural systems and to support more evidence-based, accountable, and equitable food policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Policy
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102984
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of genotyping in measuring improved variety adoption and impact: advances, challenges, and policy directions

Prabhu Pingali, Hope Michelson, Mequanint B. Melesse, Damaris A. Odeny et al.
1 citations
Food Policy
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
1.75
article

The role of genotyping in measuring improved variety adoption and impact: advances, challenges, and policy directions

Prabhu Pingali, Hope Michelson, Mequanint B. Melesse, Damaris A. Odeny, Tesfamicheal Wossen, Mywish K. Maredia, David J. Spielman, Victor Afari‐Sefa, Arega D. Alene, Showkat A. Waza, Manzoor H. Dar, Kelvin Kamunye
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Genotyping provides a more reliable and rigorous method to track adoption and impact of improved varieties. • Genotyping shows major mismatches compared to farmer-reported varieties. • Farmers’ misperceptions of varieties drive input misallocations and productivity gaps. • Success of genotyping for adoption studies depends on several enabling conditions. • This review highlights how methods and data quality shape adoption evidence for policy. Accurate measurement of agricultural technology adoption is critical for evaluating the effectiveness of investments in agricultural research and development. While household surveys have long served as the primary tool for tracking varietal adoption, growing evidence reveals systematic mismatches between self-reported and DNA verified varietal identity. These mismatches arise from distinct local and scientific varietal nomenclatures, complex seed systems, and high varietal release rates. This review examines the emerging role of genotyping, particularly DNA fingerprinting, as a complementary method for varietal identification and adoption measurement. Drawing on a growing body of studies across crops and geographies, we assess how DNA fingerprinting alters adoption estimates, reveals patterns of varietal misclassification, and enhances our understanding of seed system performance. We identify critical design considerations for implementing DNA fingerprinting at scale, including sampling strategies, reference library construction, and integration with standard household surveys. The review also highlights methodological innovations to reduce DNA fingerprinting costs and explores how fingerprinting can inform monitoring, evaluation, and scaling of agricultural innovations. Finally, we outline key research and policy priorities to mainstream DNA fingerprinting into national agricultural systems and to support more evidence-based, accountable, and equitable food policy.

Food PolicyVol. 137
International Food Policy Research Institute (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Cornell University (US), International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (KE), International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (KE), International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (IN), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.