A Global Dataset of Location Data Integrity-Assessed Reforestation Efforts

Afforestation and reforestation are popular strategies for mitigating climate change by enhancing carbon sequestration. However, the effectiveness of these efforts is often self-reported by project developers, or certified through processes with limited external validation. This leads to concerns about data reliability and project integrity. In response to increasing scrutiny of voluntary carbon markets, this study presents a dataset on global afforestation and reforestation efforts compiled from primary (meta-)information and augmented with time-series satellite imagery and other secondary data. Our dataset covers 1,289,068 planting sites from 45,628 projects spanning 33 years. Since any remote sensing-based validation effort relies on the integrity of a planting site's geographic boundary, this dataset introduces a standardized assessment of the provided site-level location information, which we summarize in one easy-to-communicate key indicator: LDIS - the Location Data Integrity Score. We find that approximately 79% of the georeferenced planting sites monitored fail on at least 1 out of 10 LDIS indicators, while 15% of the monitored projects lack machine-readable georeferenced data in the first place. In addition to enhancing accountability in the voluntary carbon market, the presented dataset also holds value as training data for e.g. computer vision-related tasks with millions of linked Sentinel-2 satellite images.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Data
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05930-9
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Global Dataset of Location Data Integrity-Assessed Reforestation Efforts

Till Koebe, Ingmar Weber, Alexandra Tyukavina, Angela John et al.
Scientific Data
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

A Global Dataset of Location Data Integrity-Assessed Reforestation Efforts

Till Koebe, Ingmar Weber, Alexandra Tyukavina, Angela John, Selvyn Allotey
article en

Abstract

Afforestation and reforestation are popular strategies for mitigating climate change by enhancing carbon sequestration. However, the effectiveness of these efforts is often self-reported by project developers, or certified through processes with limited external validation. This leads to concerns about data reliability and project integrity. In response to increasing scrutiny of voluntary carbon markets, this study presents a dataset on global afforestation and reforestation efforts compiled from primary (meta-)information and augmented with time-series satellite imagery and other secondary data. Our dataset covers 1,289,068 planting sites from 45,628 projects spanning 33 years. Since any remote sensing-based validation effort relies on the integrity of a planting site's geographic boundary, this dataset introduces a standardized assessment of the provided site-level location information, which we summarize in one easy-to-communicate key indicator: LDIS - the Location Data Integrity Score. We find that approximately 79% of the georeferenced planting sites monitored fail on at least 1 out of 10 LDIS indicators, while 15% of the monitored projects lack machine-readable georeferenced data in the first place. In addition to enhancing accountability in the voluntary carbon market, the presented dataset also holds value as training data for e.g. computer vision-related tasks with millions of linked Sentinel-2 satellite images.

Scientific DataVol. 12(1)
Max Planck Institute for Informatics (DE), Geographical Institute (HU), Saarland University (DE)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.