How the European Union & the United States Tackle the Regulatory Challenges of PFAS - A Push for International Cooperation

This research explores the latest approaches to regulating per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) domestically in the United States and compares these methods to those utilized internationally, particularly in Europe. PFAS, often referred to as "forever chemicals" due to their persistence in the environment, have become a significant concern due to their adverse effects on human health and the environment. These substances are found in a wide range of consumer products and industrial processes, leading to widespread contamination of water, soil, and wildlife. In the U.S., regulations surrounding PFAS have been slow to evolve, with patchwork state-level efforts and federal inaction creating gaps in enforcement and protection. In a comparative approach, this research seeks to provide insights into the effectiveness of the various regulatory frameworks in place internationally. Europe, particularly the European Union, has taken more proactive steps in regulating PFAS, with stricter limits on the substances, ongoing research into their effects, and initiatives to promote cleaner alternatives. By examining the successes and challenges faced by these international efforts, readers will gain a clearer understanding of what might be the most promising path forward for the United States. One key takeaway from this comparison is the potential for international cooperation to address environmental issues that transcend national borders. This paper suggests that the U.S. could benefit significantly from adopting a similar approach to the European Union, aligning its policies with international standards to prevent further environmental and public health degradation. One of the most significant barriers to comprehensive environmental policy in the U.S. is often economic. Thus, the central question explored in this research is: Can a nation be held liable for long-persisting pollutants like PFAS, and what steps should be taken to ensure accountability in addressing these contaminants?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhc.20251002.13
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How the European Union & the United States Tackle the Regulatory Challenges of PFAS - A Push for International Cooperation

Chris Wold, Joyce E. Williams
American Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
article

How the European Union & the United States Tackle the Regulatory Challenges of PFAS - A Push for International Cooperation

Chris Wold, Joyce E. Williams
article en

Abstract

This research explores the latest approaches to regulating per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) domestically in the United States and compares these methods to those utilized internationally, particularly in Europe. PFAS, often referred to as "forever chemicals" due to their persistence in the environment, have become a significant concern due to their adverse effects on human health and the environment. These substances are found in a wide range of consumer products and industrial processes, leading to widespread contamination of water, soil, and wildlife. In the U.S., regulations surrounding PFAS have been slow to evolve, with patchwork state-level efforts and federal inaction creating gaps in enforcement and protection. In a comparative approach, this research seeks to provide insights into the effectiveness of the various regulatory frameworks in place internationally. Europe, particularly the European Union, has taken more proactive steps in regulating PFAS, with stricter limits on the substances, ongoing research into their effects, and initiatives to promote cleaner alternatives. By examining the successes and challenges faced by these international efforts, readers will gain a clearer understanding of what might be the most promising path forward for the United States. One key takeaway from this comparison is the potential for international cooperation to address environmental issues that transcend national borders. This paper suggests that the U.S. could benefit significantly from adopting a similar approach to the European Union, aligning its policies with international standards to prevent further environmental and public health degradation. One of the most significant barriers to comprehensive environmental policy in the U.S. is often economic. Thus, the central question explored in this research is: Can a nation be held liable for long-persisting pollutants like PFAS, and what steps should be taken to ensure accountability in addressing these contaminants?

American Journal of Heterocyclic ChemistryVol. 10(2)
Lewis & Clark College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.