Impact of integrated care models on inpatient costs and health services efficiency: evidence from a difference-in-differences analysis in China

Integrated care effectively addresses challenges like high costs and low efficiency in healthcare. This paper investigates the impact of integrated care models in urban China on inpatient costs and health services efficiency, and explores variations by age category, chronic disease status, and healthcare institution. Data is sourced from the insurance claims database in Guangzhou (2012-2015). Seven integrated care models are introduced at different times during the study period. The propensity score matching with staggered difference-in-differences approach is employed to examine the effects of integrated care models on inpatient costs [total inpatient costs and out-of-pocket (OOP) spending] and health services efficiency [length of stay (LOS)]. After matching, 147 healthcare institutions are included, with 44 in the intervention group and 103 in the control group. There are 1721 institution-month-level observations in the intervention group and 3746 observations in the control group. Integrated care models reduce total inpatient costs (6.6%), OOP spending (17.3%), and LOS (3.3%) across all healthcare institutions. For patients aged ≥60 years receiving care in primary/secondary care institutions, there are notable decreases in total inpatient costs, OOP spending, and LOS. However, for patients aged ≥60 years in tertiary care institutions, integrated care models do not significantly affect these three outcomes. Additionally, patients with chronic diseases in primary/secondary care institutions also experience reductions in total inpatient costs, OOP spending, and LOS. Integrated care models in urban China contribute to lower inpatient costs and higher health services efficiency, particularly for older adults and patients with chronic diseases who are receiving care in primary/secondary care institutions. These findings have important policy implications for the implementation of integrated care models in urban China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Policy and Planning
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf083
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of integrated care models on inpatient costs and health services efficiency: evidence from a difference-in-differences analysis in China

Hui Zhang, Xuezhu Li, Wensu Zhou
Health Policy and Planning
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Impact of integrated care models on inpatient costs and health services efficiency: evidence from a difference-in-differences analysis in China

Hui Zhang, Xuezhu Li, Wensu Zhou
article en

Abstract

Integrated care effectively addresses challenges like high costs and low efficiency in healthcare. This paper investigates the impact of integrated care models in urban China on inpatient costs and health services efficiency, and explores variations by age category, chronic disease status, and healthcare institution. Data is sourced from the insurance claims database in Guangzhou (2012-2015). Seven integrated care models are introduced at different times during the study period. The propensity score matching with staggered difference-in-differences approach is employed to examine the effects of integrated care models on inpatient costs [total inpatient costs and out-of-pocket (OOP) spending] and health services efficiency [length of stay (LOS)]. After matching, 147 healthcare institutions are included, with 44 in the intervention group and 103 in the control group. There are 1721 institution-month-level observations in the intervention group and 3746 observations in the control group. Integrated care models reduce total inpatient costs (6.6%), OOP spending (17.3%), and LOS (3.3%) across all healthcare institutions. For patients aged ≥60 years receiving care in primary/secondary care institutions, there are notable decreases in total inpatient costs, OOP spending, and LOS. However, for patients aged ≥60 years in tertiary care institutions, integrated care models do not significantly affect these three outcomes. Additionally, patients with chronic diseases in primary/secondary care institutions also experience reductions in total inpatient costs, OOP spending, and LOS. Integrated care models in urban China contribute to lower inpatient costs and higher health services efficiency, particularly for older adults and patients with chronic diseases who are receiving care in primary/secondary care institutions. These findings have important policy implications for the implementation of integrated care models in urban China.

Health Policy and PlanningVol. 41(2)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.