Landscape context modulates the effect of local canopy cover on forest multidiversity across elevations

Abstract Declining forest biodiversity has increased focus on forest conservation and restoration. Many efforts to conserve and restore tree cover focus on the local scale, but their outcomes are frequently modulated by landscape context. While the diversity and composition of communities is strongly driven by local‐scale canopy cover, landscape‐scale habitat characteristics affect dispersal pathways and determine the species pool available for colonization of local patches. Moreover, local and landscape‐scale habitat attributes vary with elevation, but how their effects on biodiversity change with elevation remains poorly understood. We examined how local canopy cover affects forest biodiversity, and how these effects are modulated by the amount of total and disturbed forest available in the surrounding landscape along an elevational gradient. We used remote sensing and multi‐taxa biodiversity data covering plants, aculeata, moths, beetles and birds (a total of 2319 species) across 150 plots in naturally developing forests in a forest‐rich region in the northern European Alps. We calculated multidiversity across all species and for three habitat affinity guilds (forest, mixed, open‐habitat) to test for differences based on varying habitat associations. Local canopy cover negatively affected multidiversity, with the weakest effect observed for forest species. An increasing amount of forest in the surrounding landscape amplified this negative effect, while an increasing amount of disturbed forest reduced it. The negative effect of local canopy cover on multidiversity weakened with elevation and became neutral across all guilds close to the tree line. Our findings highlight that disturbances promote forest biodiversity via two fundamental pathways: reducing local canopy cover and creating a more open and diverse landscape context. Moreover, the effects of canopy cover on forest biodiversity are modulated by environmental conditions that change with elevation. Synthesis and applications . Conservation and restoration efforts should consider landscape context more explicitly when planning specific management measures. Our results suggest that canopy openings benefit biodiversity especially in landscapes with high forest cover and in low elevation areas, while conserving and re‐establishing tree cover is important in landscapes with low forest cover and close to the upper tree line.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Ecology
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70195
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Landscape context modulates the effect of local canopy cover on forest multidiversity across elevations

Alexander Keller, Sebastian König, Lisa Mandl, Cornelius Senf et al.
Journal of Applied Ecology
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

Landscape context modulates the effect of local canopy cover on forest multidiversity across elevations

Alexander Keller, Sebastian König, Lisa Mandl, Cornelius Senf, Sebastian Seibold, Rupert Seidl, Lisa Samira Geres, Tobias Richter
article en

Abstract

Abstract Declining forest biodiversity has increased focus on forest conservation and restoration. Many efforts to conserve and restore tree cover focus on the local scale, but their outcomes are frequently modulated by landscape context. While the diversity and composition of communities is strongly driven by local‐scale canopy cover, landscape‐scale habitat characteristics affect dispersal pathways and determine the species pool available for colonization of local patches. Moreover, local and landscape‐scale habitat attributes vary with elevation, but how their effects on biodiversity change with elevation remains poorly understood. We examined how local canopy cover affects forest biodiversity, and how these effects are modulated by the amount of total and disturbed forest available in the surrounding landscape along an elevational gradient. We used remote sensing and multi‐taxa biodiversity data covering plants, aculeata, moths, beetles and birds (a total of 2319 species) across 150 plots in naturally developing forests in a forest‐rich region in the northern European Alps. We calculated multidiversity across all species and for three habitat affinity guilds (forest, mixed, open‐habitat) to test for differences based on varying habitat associations. Local canopy cover negatively affected multidiversity, with the weakest effect observed for forest species. An increasing amount of forest in the surrounding landscape amplified this negative effect, while an increasing amount of disturbed forest reduced it. The negative effect of local canopy cover on multidiversity weakened with elevation and became neutral across all guilds close to the tree line. Our findings highlight that disturbances promote forest biodiversity via two fundamental pathways: reducing local canopy cover and creating a more open and diverse landscape context. Moreover, the effects of canopy cover on forest biodiversity are modulated by environmental conditions that change with elevation. Synthesis and applications . Conservation and restoration efforts should consider landscape context more explicitly when planning specific management measures. Our results suggest that canopy openings benefit biodiversity especially in landscapes with high forest cover and in low elevation areas, while conserving and re‐establishing tree cover is important in landscapes with low forest cover and close to the upper tree line.

Journal of Applied EcologyVol. 62(12)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
European Commission, Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz, Bundesamt für Naturschutz
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.