Innovation Policy Governance in the European Union and China. Comparative Analysis

The article presents a comparison of innovation policy governance in China and the European Union (EU), taking into account the impact of institutional configurations and interactions on mode of governance. It is based on a comparative method, analysing the specific governance solutions of both entities. The hierarchical governance model prevails in China, where the main role belongs to the central government, while in the EU there is a multi-level governance system involving central and regional institutions. The key result is the identification of differences and similarities in the approach to innovation policy governance. Centralisation in China favours efficient governance, while flexibility and adaptation to local needs are more pronounced in the EU. The conclusion suggests that the mode of governance of innovation policy should be adapted to the specific socio-economic and political contexts of each region in order to effectively support innovation and increase competitiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Przegląd Politologiczny
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14746/pp.2025.30.2.4
Primary Topic
Globalization, Economics, and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovation Policy Governance in the European Union and China. Comparative Analysis

Marek Świstak
Przegląd Politologiczny
Globalization, Economics, and Policies
article

Innovation Policy Governance in the European Union and China. Comparative Analysis

Marek Świstak
article en

Abstract

The article presents a comparison of innovation policy governance in China and the European Union (EU), taking into account the impact of institutional configurations and interactions on mode of governance. It is based on a comparative method, analysing the specific governance solutions of both entities. The hierarchical governance model prevails in China, where the main role belongs to the central government, while in the EU there is a multi-level governance system involving central and regional institutions. The key result is the identification of differences and similarities in the approach to innovation policy governance. Centralisation in China favours efficient governance, while flexibility and adaptation to local needs are more pronounced in the EU. The conclusion suggests that the mode of governance of innovation policy should be adapted to the specific socio-economic and political contexts of each region in order to effectively support innovation and increase competitiveness.

Przegląd Politologiczny(2)
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Globalization, Economics, and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.