A Change in C–H Activation Mechanism: Experimental and Computational Investigations of Rh-Catalyzed Disubstituted Benzene Functionalization

We report the ethenylation of 1,3- and 1,2-disubstituted benzenes using [(η<sup>2</sup>-C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Rh-(μ-OAc)]<sub>2</sub> as a catalyst precursor and Cu-(OPiv)<sub>2</sub> as the oxidant. The regioselectivity of alkenylation for 1,3-disubstituted benzenes produces 3,5-disubstituted styrene products, while the alkenylation of 1,2-disubstituted benzenes produces 3,4-disubstituted styrene products. The rate of alkenylation is influenced by steric and electronic factors based on the substituents of the benzene unit. In all cases, 1,2-disubstituted benzenes react faster than 1,3-disubstituted benzenes, with a rate difference that is from 2 times up to >70 times more rapid for 1,2-disubstituted substrates. This is likely due to the difference in the number of accessible C-H bonds based on the steric protection of C-H bonds adjacent to functionality. Furthermore, the rate of alkenylation is influenced by the arene substituent electronics. The rates of alkenylation for 1,2-disubstituted benzenes follow the trend OMe > Me > CF<sub>3</sub> > Cl, while for 1,3-disubstituted benzenes the trend is CF<sub>3</sub> > Cl > Me > OMe. Using quantum mechanics DFT calculations, we found that the C-H activation step can occur by two different mechanisms. The electronic properties of substituents on the arene ring change the preferred C-H bond-breaking mechanism for 1,2-disubstituted and 1,3-disubstituted benzenes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organometallics
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.organomet.5c00379
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Change in C–H Activation Mechanism: Experimental and Computational Investigations of Rh-Catalyzed Disubstituted Benzene Functionalization

T. Brent Gunnoe, Christopher Reid, William A. Goddard, Kendall N. Houk et al.
1 citations
Organometallics
Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
0.94
article

A Change in C–H Activation Mechanism: Experimental and Computational Investigations of Rh-Catalyzed Disubstituted Benzene Functionalization

T. Brent Gunnoe, Christopher Reid, William A. Goddard, Kendall N. Houk, Chi Zhang, Lauren E. Baptiste
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We report the ethenylation of 1,3- and 1,2-disubstituted benzenes using [(η<sup>2</sup>-C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Rh-(μ-OAc)]<sub>2</sub> as a catalyst precursor and Cu-(OPiv)<sub>2</sub> as the oxidant. The regioselectivity of alkenylation for 1,3-disubstituted benzenes produces 3,5-disubstituted styrene products, while the alkenylation of 1,2-disubstituted benzenes produces 3,4-disubstituted styrene products. The rate of alkenylation is influenced by steric and electronic factors based on the substituents of the benzene unit. In all cases, 1,2-disubstituted benzenes react faster than 1,3-disubstituted benzenes, with a rate difference that is from 2 times up to >70 times more rapid for 1,2-disubstituted substrates. This is likely due to the difference in the number of accessible C-H bonds based on the steric protection of C-H bonds adjacent to functionality. Furthermore, the rate of alkenylation is influenced by the arene substituent electronics. The rates of alkenylation for 1,2-disubstituted benzenes follow the trend OMe > Me > CF<sub>3</sub> > Cl, while for 1,3-disubstituted benzenes the trend is CF<sub>3</sub> > Cl > Me > OMe. Using quantum mechanics DFT calculations, we found that the C-H activation step can occur by two different mechanisms. The electronic properties of substituents on the arene ring change the preferred C-H bond-breaking mechanism for 1,2-disubstituted and 1,3-disubstituted benzenes.

OrganometallicsVol. 44(21)
California Institute of Technology (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California System (US), University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.