Between cluelessness and (dis)satisfaction: What C-level executives, middle managers and employees know and think about corporate communications in their organizations

Purpose The study explores how top managers, middle managers and employees in large companies perceive corporate communications and the activities of communication departments in their organizations. This knowledge helps communication leaders to gain a realistic understanding of their playing field and to develop profiles that matter for their organization and internal clients. Design/methodology/approach An online survey with 1,147 respondents from different hierarchical levels in for-profit companies with more than 1,000 employees was conducted in Germany, the world’s third largest economy. Findings The study reveals major knowledge gaps regarding the objectives and activities of communication departments among respondents on all levels. However, higher-ranked managers have a better understanding, and those with a stronger proximity to the functional unit evaluate communications more positively. The majority of respondents indicate that communicators should make it clearer what their tasks are and who benefits from them. Research limitations/implications Insights are limited to large organizations in the business world. Results might differ for non-profit, governmental, or state-owned organizations and for smaller companies without a dedicated communication department. Practical implications The empirical study informs communication leaders about typical (mis-)perceptions of professional communication work among decision-makers and employees, challenging them to review the situation in their own organization. Originality/value This is the first comprehensive study that uses a multilevel approach to reveal internal perceptions of communication departments. It identifies gaps that demand more research, for example, on the reasons for different perceptions and on solutions such as strategies for positioning communication departments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Communication Management
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-10-2024-0216
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between cluelessness and (dis)satisfaction: What C-level executives, middle managers and employees know and think about corporate communications in their organizations

Jana Brockhaus, Ansgar Zerfaß, A Ruth
Journal of Communication Management
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Between cluelessness and (dis)satisfaction: What C-level executives, middle managers and employees know and think about corporate communications in their organizations

Jana Brockhaus, Ansgar Zerfaß, A Ruth
article en

Abstract

Purpose The study explores how top managers, middle managers and employees in large companies perceive corporate communications and the activities of communication departments in their organizations. This knowledge helps communication leaders to gain a realistic understanding of their playing field and to develop profiles that matter for their organization and internal clients. Design/methodology/approach An online survey with 1,147 respondents from different hierarchical levels in for-profit companies with more than 1,000 employees was conducted in Germany, the world’s third largest economy. Findings The study reveals major knowledge gaps regarding the objectives and activities of communication departments among respondents on all levels. However, higher-ranked managers have a better understanding, and those with a stronger proximity to the functional unit evaluate communications more positively. The majority of respondents indicate that communicators should make it clearer what their tasks are and who benefits from them. Research limitations/implications Insights are limited to large organizations in the business world. Results might differ for non-profit, governmental, or state-owned organizations and for smaller companies without a dedicated communication department. Practical implications The empirical study informs communication leaders about typical (mis-)perceptions of professional communication work among decision-makers and employees, challenging them to review the situation in their own organization. Originality/value This is the first comprehensive study that uses a multilevel approach to reveal internal perceptions of communication departments. It identifies gaps that demand more research, for example, on the reasons for different perceptions and on solutions such as strategies for positioning communication departments.

Journal of Communication Management
BI Norwegian Business School (NO), Leipzig University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.