Does Intraoperative Navigation Improve K-Wire Positioning in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty?—A New Approach

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> In reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), precise K-wire positioning of the glenoid component is critical to prevent complications such as glenoid loosening or instability as well as premature implant failure. Optimal component placement must adhere to individualized preoperative plans to account for patient-specific anatomical conditions. Conventional methods often fail to achieve this level of accuracy, undermining the need for personalized medicine. Intraoperative navigation systems are growing in use to improve accuracy in orthopedic surgery. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of K-wire positioning in a 3D-printed model of the scapula using conventional versus navigated methods. <b>Methods:</b> We recruited 20 participants: 10 experienced surgeons and 10 inexperienced medical students. Each participant performed four K-wire drillings-two with conventional instruments and two with an intraoperative navigation system. A novel target system, BoneTrack3D, was used to measure accuracy. We assessed the absolute deviation of the entry and exit points as well as the three-dimensional drilling angle. <b>Results:</b> The navigated method was significantly more accurate for all measured parameters at a family-wise significance level of α = 0.05. The median absolute deviation for the entry point was 1.6 mm with navigation versus 3.0 mm with the conventional method (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, the exit point deviation was 1.8 mm with navigation versus 6.7 mm conventionally (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The drilling angle deviation also showed significant improvement with navigation, at 2.6° compared to 8.9° conventionally (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, the navigated method took longer, with a median drilling time of 100.0 s compared to 55.0 s for the conventional method (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The navigated method provided consistent and superior results regardless of a participant's surgical experience. <b>Conclusions:</b> Navigated techniques for K-wire positioning in RSA demonstrate enhanced accuracy in a 3D-printed model, effectively executing a precise, patient-specific preoperative plan. This could be a direct contribution to personalized medicine, ensuring the final implant alignment is tailored to the individual's anatomy. Furthermore, intraoperative navigation may contribute to a flatter learning curve, thereby increasing accessibility for surgeons with varying levels of experience. Although navigation introduces additional costs and longer initial procedure times, these drawbacks could be offset by improved technical outcomes and a reduced risk of complications. Future studies, including randomized clinical trials and cost-effectiveness analyses, should seek to validate these results in clinical settings with longer follow-up periods and larger patient cohorts to define long-term value and utility of navigation systems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15110509
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Intraoperative Navigation Improve K-Wire Positioning in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty?—A New Approach

Georg Gosheger, Vincent Hofbauer, Timo Blaszczyk, Jonathan Wohlmuth
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Does Intraoperative Navigation Improve K-Wire Positioning in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty?—A New Approach

Georg Gosheger, Vincent Hofbauer, Timo Blaszczyk, Jonathan Wohlmuth
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> In reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), precise K-wire positioning of the glenoid component is critical to prevent complications such as glenoid loosening or instability as well as premature implant failure. Optimal component placement must adhere to individualized preoperative plans to account for patient-specific anatomical conditions. Conventional methods often fail to achieve this level of accuracy, undermining the need for personalized medicine. Intraoperative navigation systems are growing in use to improve accuracy in orthopedic surgery. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of K-wire positioning in a 3D-printed model of the scapula using conventional versus navigated methods. <b>Methods:</b> We recruited 20 participants: 10 experienced surgeons and 10 inexperienced medical students. Each participant performed four K-wire drillings-two with conventional instruments and two with an intraoperative navigation system. A novel target system, BoneTrack3D, was used to measure accuracy. We assessed the absolute deviation of the entry and exit points as well as the three-dimensional drilling angle. <b>Results:</b> The navigated method was significantly more accurate for all measured parameters at a family-wise significance level of α = 0.05. The median absolute deviation for the entry point was 1.6 mm with navigation versus 3.0 mm with the conventional method (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, the exit point deviation was 1.8 mm with navigation versus 6.7 mm conventionally (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The drilling angle deviation also showed significant improvement with navigation, at 2.6° compared to 8.9° conventionally (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, the navigated method took longer, with a median drilling time of 100.0 s compared to 55.0 s for the conventional method (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The navigated method provided consistent and superior results regardless of a participant's surgical experience. <b>Conclusions:</b> Navigated techniques for K-wire positioning in RSA demonstrate enhanced accuracy in a 3D-printed model, effectively executing a precise, patient-specific preoperative plan. This could be a direct contribution to personalized medicine, ensuring the final implant alignment is tailored to the individual's anatomy. Furthermore, intraoperative navigation may contribute to a flatter learning curve, thereby increasing accessibility for surgeons with varying levels of experience. Although navigation introduces additional costs and longer initial procedure times, these drawbacks could be offset by improved technical outcomes and a reduced risk of complications. Future studies, including randomized clinical trials and cost-effectiveness analyses, should seek to validate these results in clinical settings with longer follow-up periods and larger patient cohorts to define long-term value and utility of navigation systems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 15(11)
University Hospital Münster (DE), FH Aachen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.