Macitentan in the Treatment of Digital Ulcers in Patients with Systemic Rheumatic Autoimmune Diseases: A National Multicenter Study of 42 Patients

<b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the real-world safety and efficacy of macitentan (MACI) in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) and refractory digital ulcers (DUs). <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective observational study of 42 patients treated with MACI (10 mg/day) on a compassionate-use basis across Spanish reference hospitals. Given the cohort's heterogeneity, a two-step analysis was performed: a global assessment of all patients, followed by a subgroup analysis restricted to those with systemic sclerosis (SSc) or fulfilling very early SSc (VEDOSS) criteria to explore predictors of response. Efficacy was defined as complete healing, partial response, or a lack of response based on physician assessment. Safety was evaluated through analysis of adverse events. <b>Results:</b> In the global cohort, MACI demonstrated a high rate of complete ulcer healing (82.9%) at the 3-month follow-up, with a significant reduction in median ulcer count (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Subgroup analysis within the SSc/VEDOSS cohort (n = 36) revealed that the presence of gastrointestinal involvement (GI) and a higher baseline DUs were significant predictors of a poorer therapeutic response (<i>p</i> = 0.022 and <i>p</i> = 0.028). The drug was well-tolerated; adverse events were infrequent and rarely led to treatment discontinuation. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this real-world refractory population, MACI was associated with rapid DU healing and a favorable safety profile. GI and higher ulcer burden predicted diminished treatment response in SSc patients. These results support the use of MACI as a valuable therapeutic option for severe digital vasculopathy in SARDs, although further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217546
Primary Topic
Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Macitentan in the Treatment of Digital Ulcers in Patients with Systemic Rheumatic Autoimmune Diseases: A National Multicenter Study of 42 Patients

Ivan Castellvi, Leyre Riancho Zarrabeitia, Belén Atienza‐Mateo, M. Garijo Bufort et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
article

Macitentan in the Treatment of Digital Ulcers in Patients with Systemic Rheumatic Autoimmune Diseases: A National Multicenter Study of 42 Patients

Ivan Castellvi, Leyre Riancho Zarrabeitia, Belén Atienza‐Mateo, M. Garijo Bufort, Silvia Montes García, C Perlès, José Andrés Lorenzo Martín, Elena Aurrecoechea, C. Moriano, Alejandro Martı́nez-Martı́nez, Esther F. Vicente‐Rabaneda, Miriam Retuerto, G. González Arribas, Elvira Díez Álvarez, Carlos de la Puente Bujidos, Vanesa Calvo-Río, Cristina Corrales Selaya, María Hildegarda Godoy Tundido
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the real-world safety and efficacy of macitentan (MACI) in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) and refractory digital ulcers (DUs). <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective observational study of 42 patients treated with MACI (10 mg/day) on a compassionate-use basis across Spanish reference hospitals. Given the cohort's heterogeneity, a two-step analysis was performed: a global assessment of all patients, followed by a subgroup analysis restricted to those with systemic sclerosis (SSc) or fulfilling very early SSc (VEDOSS) criteria to explore predictors of response. Efficacy was defined as complete healing, partial response, or a lack of response based on physician assessment. Safety was evaluated through analysis of adverse events. <b>Results:</b> In the global cohort, MACI demonstrated a high rate of complete ulcer healing (82.9%) at the 3-month follow-up, with a significant reduction in median ulcer count (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Subgroup analysis within the SSc/VEDOSS cohort (n = 36) revealed that the presence of gastrointestinal involvement (GI) and a higher baseline DUs were significant predictors of a poorer therapeutic response (<i>p</i> = 0.022 and <i>p</i> = 0.028). The drug was well-tolerated; adverse events were infrequent and rarely led to treatment discontinuation. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this real-world refractory population, MACI was associated with rapid DU healing and a favorable safety profile. GI and higher ulcer burden predicted diminished treatment response in SSc patients. These results support the use of MACI as a valuable therapeutic option for severe digital vasculopathy in SARDs, although further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these observations.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(21)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Hospital de Sant Pau (ES), ProMedica Toledo Hospital (US), Hospital General Nuestra Señora del Prado (ES), Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (ES), Hospital Sierrallana (ES), Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (ES), Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (ES), Hospital Universitario de Burgos (ES), Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (ES), Hospital de Sagunto (ES), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (ES), Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo (ES), Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia (ES), Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.