Results of open and endonasal approaches in surgical treatment of the most common malignant tumors of the paranasal sinuses and skull base

Malignant neoplasms of the paranasal sinuses and skullbase are rare. They account for 3—5% of malignant tumors of the head and neck and less than 1% of all malignant neoplasms. The main method of surgical treatment of these tumors is transfacial operations. Such operations lead to serious complications: cosmetic defects and scars on the face, wound infections, long recovery time, which leads to an increase in the duration of hospitalization and a delay in adjuvant treatment. Endoscopic endonasal surgery has significantly advanced, expanding the indications for use over the past 20 years. This technical progress has made this treatment method a real alternative to transfacial approaches in surgery for malignant neoplasms of the paranasal sinuses and skull base. Numerous studies have shown that survival outcomes with the endoscopic endonasal approach are comparable, and in some cases even better, than with the open approach. However, given the rarity of this disease, personalized choice of treatment tactics remains a priority today.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
P A Herzen Journal of Oncology
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog20251405183
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Results of open and endonasal approaches in surgical treatment of the most common malignant tumors of the paranasal sinuses and skull base

M.A. Kucheryavykh, N.I. Mikhailov, A.M. Zaitsev
P A Herzen Journal of Oncology
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
article

Results of open and endonasal approaches in surgical treatment of the most common malignant tumors of the paranasal sinuses and skull base

M.A. Kucheryavykh, N.I. Mikhailov, A.M. Zaitsev
article en

Abstract

Malignant neoplasms of the paranasal sinuses and skullbase are rare. They account for 3—5% of malignant tumors of the head and neck and less than 1% of all malignant neoplasms. The main method of surgical treatment of these tumors is transfacial operations. Such operations lead to serious complications: cosmetic defects and scars on the face, wound infections, long recovery time, which leads to an increase in the duration of hospitalization and a delay in adjuvant treatment. Endoscopic endonasal surgery has significantly advanced, expanding the indications for use over the past 20 years. This technical progress has made this treatment method a real alternative to transfacial approaches in surgery for malignant neoplasms of the paranasal sinuses and skull base. Numerous studies have shown that survival outcomes with the endoscopic endonasal approach are comparable, and in some cases even better, than with the open approach. However, given the rarity of this disease, personalized choice of treatment tactics remains a priority today.

P A Herzen Journal of OncologyVol. 14(5)
P.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Results of open and endonasal approaches in surgical treatment of the most common malignant tumors of the paranasal sinuses and skull base — M.A. Kucheryavykh, N.I. Mikhailov, et al. · P A Herzen Journal of Oncology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS