Diagnostic Performance of Serum Neutrophil–Lymphocyte and Serum Monocyte–Lymphocyte Ratios in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Comparative Meta-Analytic Review of 29 Studies

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains one of the most devastating complications of arthroplasty, with early diagnosis crucial for successful management. The serum neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) have been proposed as simple, inexpensive inflammatory biomarkers, but their diagnostic performance in PJI remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of serum NLR and MLR in detecting PJI. Materials and <b>Methods:</b> A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus up to April 2025. Twenty-nine eligible studies (<i>n</i> = 14,040 patients; 3418 with PJI, 10,622 without PJI) reporting diagnostic metrics for serum NLR or MLR were included. Extracted data comprised mean biomarker values, cut-off thresholds, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Non-parametric statistical tests and subgroup analyses were applied to examine performance across infection types and PJI definitions. <b>Results:</b> Both serum NLR and MLR were significantly elevated in PJI patients compared with aseptic cases (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.003, respectively). Pooled diagnostic accuracy was moderate: mean AUC 0.719 for NLR and 0.700 for MLR. For NLR, mean sensitivity was 69.9% and specificity 69.8%, with an average cut-off of 2.88. For MLR, mean sensitivity was 68.2% and specificity 70.4%, with an average cut-off of 0.34. Subgroup analyses indicated superior diagnostic performance of NLR in acute infections and variability depending on the PJI definition employed (<i>p</i> = 0.037). Strong correlations were observed between standardized mean differences in biomarker levels and corresponding diagnostic accuracy, particularly for NLR (ρ = 0.802, <i>p</i> = 0.002). <b>Conclusions:</b> Serum NLR demonstrates slightly superior diagnostic accuracy over serum MLR in identifying PJI, especially in acute settings. Both markers are inexpensive and widely accessible but show only moderate discriminative capacity, supporting their role as adjunctive rather than standalone diagnostic tools. Further large-scale prospective studies with harmonized methodologies are needed to refine biomarker thresholds and integrate them into multimodal diagnostic algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217645
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Performance of Serum Neutrophil–Lymphocyte and Serum Monocyte–Lymphocyte Ratios in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Comparative Meta-Analytic Review of 29 Studies

Andreea Elena Vorovenci, Cristian Scheau, Şerban Dragosloveanu, Victoria Bîrluțiu et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
2.01
article

Diagnostic Performance of Serum Neutrophil–Lymphocyte and Serum Monocyte–Lymphocyte Ratios in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Comparative Meta-Analytic Review of 29 Studies

Andreea Elena Vorovenci, Cristian Scheau, Şerban Dragosloveanu, Victoria Bîrluțiu, Rareş Mircea Bîrluţiu, Bogdan Neamţu, Maryam Salimi, Andrei Larie, Edoardo-Cristian Anea
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains one of the most devastating complications of arthroplasty, with early diagnosis crucial for successful management. The serum neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) have been proposed as simple, inexpensive inflammatory biomarkers, but their diagnostic performance in PJI remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of serum NLR and MLR in detecting PJI. Materials and <b>Methods:</b> A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus up to April 2025. Twenty-nine eligible studies (<i>n</i> = 14,040 patients; 3418 with PJI, 10,622 without PJI) reporting diagnostic metrics for serum NLR or MLR were included. Extracted data comprised mean biomarker values, cut-off thresholds, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Non-parametric statistical tests and subgroup analyses were applied to examine performance across infection types and PJI definitions. <b>Results:</b> Both serum NLR and MLR were significantly elevated in PJI patients compared with aseptic cases (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.003, respectively). Pooled diagnostic accuracy was moderate: mean AUC 0.719 for NLR and 0.700 for MLR. For NLR, mean sensitivity was 69.9% and specificity 69.8%, with an average cut-off of 2.88. For MLR, mean sensitivity was 68.2% and specificity 70.4%, with an average cut-off of 0.34. Subgroup analyses indicated superior diagnostic performance of NLR in acute infections and variability depending on the PJI definition employed (<i>p</i> = 0.037). Strong correlations were observed between standardized mean differences in biomarker levels and corresponding diagnostic accuracy, particularly for NLR (ρ = 0.802, <i>p</i> = 0.002). <b>Conclusions:</b> Serum NLR demonstrates slightly superior diagnostic accuracy over serum MLR in identifying PJI, especially in acute settings. Both markers are inexpensive and widely accessible but show only moderate discriminative capacity, supporting their role as adjunctive rather than standalone diagnostic tools. Further large-scale prospective studies with harmonized methodologies are needed to refine biomarker thresholds and integrate them into multimodal diagnostic algorithms.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(21)
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO), Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US), Bucharest University of Economic Studies (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.