The First Cavalries in the Ancient Near East

Abstract As a causative factor in premodern history, it is hard to overrate the significance of cavalry, the organized use, that is, of skilled riders in mounted warfare. Yet the origins of cavalry have garnered scant attention lately, at least among historians of the ancient Near East. The reasons for this neglect are complex, but the essential cause is that military historians, once a plentiful group, now make up only a tiny band within the academy. Cavalry’s origins therefore remain murky. A prevailing theory, the “Early Steppe Riders Thesis,” supposes that good military riding appeared as early as the fourth millennium B.C. on the steppes of Eurasia. The minority theory (the “Iron Age Near East Thesis”) has cavalry evolving from chariotry in the Iron Age Near East. The present essay uses this larger debate as a springboard, but its focus is narrower. Its aim is to establish when, where, and under what circumstances cavalry rose in the ancient Near East. I exploit new finds and reexamine known evidence, both written and representational, from Assyria, Urarṭu, and the Syro-Anatolian Culture Complex (SACC). I argue that the big changes first occurred not in Assyria, or Urarṭu (as a minority of Iron Age Near East Thesis scholars have held), but among the Syro-Anatolian polities. After glimpses of Middle Bronze Age riding in Syria, true cavalries are manifest by the second half of the tenth century in SACC. If accepted, these conclusions could rectify misconceptions about the Syro-Anatolian Kulturraum as militarily passive and sterile and could provide a solider basis for judging the place of the Near East in the larger conversation about the world-historical origins of cavalry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/janeh-2025-0002
Primary Topic
Ancient Near East History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The First Cavalries in the Ancient Near East

Benjamin M. Sullivan
Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History
Ancient Near East History
article

The First Cavalries in the Ancient Near East

Benjamin M. Sullivan
article en

Abstract

Abstract As a causative factor in premodern history, it is hard to overrate the significance of cavalry, the organized use, that is, of skilled riders in mounted warfare. Yet the origins of cavalry have garnered scant attention lately, at least among historians of the ancient Near East. The reasons for this neglect are complex, but the essential cause is that military historians, once a plentiful group, now make up only a tiny band within the academy. Cavalry’s origins therefore remain murky. A prevailing theory, the “Early Steppe Riders Thesis,” supposes that good military riding appeared as early as the fourth millennium B.C. on the steppes of Eurasia. The minority theory (the “Iron Age Near East Thesis”) has cavalry evolving from chariotry in the Iron Age Near East. The present essay uses this larger debate as a springboard, but its focus is narrower. Its aim is to establish when, where, and under what circumstances cavalry rose in the ancient Near East. I exploit new finds and reexamine known evidence, both written and representational, from Assyria, Urarṭu, and the Syro-Anatolian Culture Complex (SACC). I argue that the big changes first occurred not in Assyria, or Urarṭu (as a minority of Iron Age Near East Thesis scholars have held), but among the Syro-Anatolian polities. After glimpses of Middle Bronze Age riding in Syria, true cavalries are manifest by the second half of the tenth century in SACC. If accepted, these conclusions could rectify misconceptions about the Syro-Anatolian Kulturraum as militarily passive and sterile and could provide a solider basis for judging the place of the Near East in the larger conversation about the world-historical origins of cavalry.

Journal of Ancient Near Eastern HistoryVol. 12(2)
University of California, Riverside (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Ancient Near East History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.