Measuring wild animal welfare attitudes: The attitudes towards wild animal welfare scale

Wild animals suffer from many naturally occurring harms such as starvation, diseases, and conflicts with other animals, yet little research has been conducted on how people view the natural suffering of wild animals. In this paper we introduce the Attitudes towards Wild Animal Welfare (AWAW) scale. The AWAW scale consists of four subscales: caring about wild animal welfare, support for intervening in nature, idyllic views of nature, and intervention ineffectiveness beliefs. Items were pretested and verified across four preregistered studies ( N = 2866). The factors demonstrated good reliability and strongly correlated with related measures, including general animal attitudes, speciesism, and support for specific wild animal welfare interventions. The idyllic view factor showed weaker correlations with other measures but was retained due to its theoretical significance. All four factors predicted a decision to give a bonus payment to a wild animal charity. Our aim is that the scale will facilitate further psychological research on wild animal welfare and, in turn, inform interventions and policies aimed at reducing the suffering of wild animals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology of Human-Animal Intergroup Relations
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5964/phair.17951
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring wild animal welfare attitudes: The attitudes towards wild animal welfare scale

William H.B. McAuliffe, David Reinstein, David A. Moss, Willem W. A. Sleegers et al.
Psychology of Human-Animal Intergroup Relations
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

Measuring wild animal welfare attitudes: The attitudes towards wild animal welfare scale

William H.B. McAuliffe, David Reinstein, David A. Moss, Willem W. A. Sleegers, Daniela Romero Waldhorn
article en

Abstract

Wild animals suffer from many naturally occurring harms such as starvation, diseases, and conflicts with other animals, yet little research has been conducted on how people view the natural suffering of wild animals. In this paper we introduce the Attitudes towards Wild Animal Welfare (AWAW) scale. The AWAW scale consists of four subscales: caring about wild animal welfare, support for intervening in nature, idyllic views of nature, and intervention ineffectiveness beliefs. Items were pretested and verified across four preregistered studies ( N = 2866). The factors demonstrated good reliability and strongly correlated with related measures, including general animal attitudes, speciesism, and support for specific wild animal welfare interventions. The idyllic view factor showed weaker correlations with other measures but was retained due to its theoretical significance. All four factors predicted a decision to give a bonus payment to a wild animal charity. Our aim is that the scale will facilitate further psychological research on wild animal welfare and, in turn, inform interventions and policies aimed at reducing the suffering of wild animals.

Psychology of Human-Animal Intergroup RelationsVol. 4
Maastricht School of Management (NL), Maastricht University (NL), ReThink Medical (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Measuring wild animal welfare attitudes: The attitudes towards wild animal welfare scale — William H.B. McAuliffe, David Reinstein, et al. · Psychology of Human-Animal Intergroup Relations (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS