Behavioral and infrastructure influences on electric vehicle charging and grid impact

• CPT model captures heterogeneity in EV charging behavior. • A dynamic reference point models expectations and perceived charging losses. • Survey reveals four user types with distinct charging preferences. • Behavioral traits have limited impact on system-level load profiles. • Workplace charging reshapes demand and reduces evening peak loads. Electric vehicle (EV) adoption reshapes travel and electricity demand. We integrate a Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) model with a dynamic reference-point mechanism into daily travel routines derived from the 2022 U.S. National Household Travel Survey. Using empirical data from 283 EV users, the simulation generates charging behavior for 10,000 synthetic individuals. Four behavioral archetypes emerge: Home-Focused, Work-Focused, Anxious Opportunistic, and Long-Distance drivers, with unique charging preferences and infrastructure requirements. While behavioral factors significantly influence individual charging decisions, our sensitivity analysis demonstrates that varying CPT parameters across their observed ranges alters aggregate daily energy consumption by less than 1%. Conversely, infrastructure changes, such as increased workplace charging, significantly shift evening charging to morning (up to 50.9%) and reduce evening peak load (9.3% reduction). These results suggest that while behavioral modeling is important at the individual level, infrastructure design plays a more critical role in managing overall grid impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.105011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behavioral and infrastructure influences on electric vehicle charging and grid impact

Alyssa Ryan, Xiaoqin Fu, Yuxi Shen, Meiyu Pan et al.
1 citations
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
0.73
article

Behavioral and infrastructure influences on electric vehicle charging and grid impact

Alyssa Ryan, Xiaoqin Fu, Yuxi Shen, Meiyu Pan, Liang Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• CPT model captures heterogeneity in EV charging behavior. • A dynamic reference point models expectations and perceived charging losses. • Survey reveals four user types with distinct charging preferences. • Behavioral traits have limited impact on system-level load profiles. • Workplace charging reshapes demand and reduces evening peak loads. Electric vehicle (EV) adoption reshapes travel and electricity demand. We integrate a Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) model with a dynamic reference-point mechanism into daily travel routines derived from the 2022 U.S. National Household Travel Survey. Using empirical data from 283 EV users, the simulation generates charging behavior for 10,000 synthetic individuals. Four behavioral archetypes emerge: Home-Focused, Work-Focused, Anxious Opportunistic, and Long-Distance drivers, with unique charging preferences and infrastructure requirements. While behavioral factors significantly influence individual charging decisions, our sensitivity analysis demonstrates that varying CPT parameters across their observed ranges alters aggregate daily energy consumption by less than 1%. Conversely, infrastructure changes, such as increased workplace charging, significantly shift evening charging to morning (up to 50.9%) and reduce evening peak load (9.3% reduction). These results suggest that while behavioral modeling is important at the individual level, infrastructure design plays a more critical role in managing overall grid impacts.

Transportation Research Part D Transport and EnvironmentVol. 149
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), University of Arizona (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.