Distinct Difference in the Geometries of NCCL <sup>–</sup> Anions (L = N <sub>2</sub> , CO, CS): A Balance Between π Conjugation and Steric Repulsion

NCCL<sup>-</sup> anions (L = N<sub>2</sub>, CO and CS) exhibit notable geometric differences: NCCNN<sup>-</sup> favors a bent structure, whereas NCCCO<sup>-</sup> and NCCCS<sup>-</sup> prefer linear configurations. Here, we investigate the origin of their geometric differences using the conventional density functional theory (DFT) and block-localized wave function (BLW) method. Computations reveal that the bent structure is preferred for all species at the BLW state in which the in-plane π<sub>//</sub> back-donation from NCC<sup>-</sup> to ligands is disabled. For NCCNN<sup>-</sup>, enforcing linearity leads to a gain in the π<sub>//</sub> electron delocalization (conjugation) stability, but it is insufficient to offset the steric penalty. Differently, NCCCO<sup>-</sup> and NCCCS<sup>-</sup> experience reduced steric repulsion in linear geometries, thereby favoring more linear geometries as their energy minima. "<i>In situ</i>" orbital correlation diagrams reveal an orbital swap in NCC<sup>-</sup> with the approaching of the ligand L and confirm the carbone theory proposed by the Frenking group. Overall, the geometries (or the degree of bending) of NCCL<sup>-</sup> anions are governed by the balance between the π<sub>//</sub> conjugation and steric repulsion. Substituting the electron-withdrawing NC group with CH<sub>3</sub> or F, which provides in-plane σ-electrons or lone pairs, further bends the ∠RCL angle in RCNN<sup>-</sup> anions, while RCCO<sup>-</sup> and RCCS<sup>-</sup> retain their nearly linear forms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inorganic Chemistry
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c04439
Primary Topic
Crystallography and molecular interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinct Difference in the Geometries of NCCL – Anions (L = N 2 , CO, CS): A Balance Between π Conjugation and Steric Repulsion

Yirong Mo, Jinshuai Song, Rui Ma, Yandong Duan et al.
Inorganic Chemistry
Crystallography and molecular interactions
article

Distinct Difference in the Geometries of NCCL – Anions (L = N 2 , CO, CS): A Balance Between π Conjugation and Steric Repulsion

Yirong Mo, Jinshuai Song, Rui Ma, Yandong Duan, Xiaoyan Li, Huaiyu Zhang, Jia Wei
article en

Abstract

NCCL<sup>-</sup> anions (L = N<sub>2</sub>, CO and CS) exhibit notable geometric differences: NCCNN<sup>-</sup> favors a bent structure, whereas NCCCO<sup>-</sup> and NCCCS<sup>-</sup> prefer linear configurations. Here, we investigate the origin of their geometric differences using the conventional density functional theory (DFT) and block-localized wave function (BLW) method. Computations reveal that the bent structure is preferred for all species at the BLW state in which the in-plane π<sub>//</sub> back-donation from NCC<sup>-</sup> to ligands is disabled. For NCCNN<sup>-</sup>, enforcing linearity leads to a gain in the π<sub>//</sub> electron delocalization (conjugation) stability, but it is insufficient to offset the steric penalty. Differently, NCCCO<sup>-</sup> and NCCCS<sup>-</sup> experience reduced steric repulsion in linear geometries, thereby favoring more linear geometries as their energy minima. "<i>In situ</i>" orbital correlation diagrams reveal an orbital swap in NCC<sup>-</sup> with the approaching of the ligand L and confirm the carbone theory proposed by the Frenking group. Overall, the geometries (or the degree of bending) of NCCL<sup>-</sup> anions are governed by the balance between the π<sub>//</sub> conjugation and steric repulsion. Substituting the electron-withdrawing NC group with CH<sub>3</sub> or F, which provides in-plane σ-electrons or lone pairs, further bends the ∠RCL angle in RCNN<sup>-</sup> anions, while RCCO<sup>-</sup> and RCCS<sup>-</sup> retain their nearly linear forms.

Inorganic ChemistryVol. 64(44)
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), Interface (United States) (US), Hebei University of Science and Technology (CN), Zhengzhou University (CN), Nanomaterials Research (United States) (US), Hebei Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Crystallography and molecular interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.