Preventing spread of chemical weapons in an era of rapid technological change

Abstract Science and technology are evolving at a remarkable pace, providing innovative solutions to global challenges. Developments are improving healthcare, driving sustainability, and enhancing quality of life, while playing a critical role in achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. But this rapid progress also brings new complexities, particularly for science-based disarmament treaties. How can we ensure these agreements remain robust in this rapidly evolving scientific landscape? Using the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) as an example, Sarah Clapham and Peter Hotchkiss from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) explore this question, describing the mechanisms in place to effectively monitor and assess progress in science and technology while highlighting select relevant advances.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Chemistry International
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ci-2025-0403
Primary Topic
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preventing spread of chemical weapons in an era of rapid technological change

Peter J. Hotchkiss, Sarah Clapham
Chemistry International
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
article

Preventing spread of chemical weapons in an era of rapid technological change

Peter J. Hotchkiss, Sarah Clapham
article en

Abstract

Abstract Science and technology are evolving at a remarkable pace, providing innovative solutions to global challenges. Developments are improving healthcare, driving sustainability, and enhancing quality of life, while playing a critical role in achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. But this rapid progress also brings new complexities, particularly for science-based disarmament treaties. How can we ensure these agreements remain robust in this rapidly evolving scientific landscape? Using the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) as an example, Sarah Clapham and Peter Hotchkiss from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) explore this question, describing the mechanisms in place to effectively monitor and assess progress in science and technology while highlighting select relevant advances.

Chemistry InternationalVol. 47(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.