Nanomolar-scale sulfate sulfur isotope analysis using a combined ion chromatography–barite precipitation and nano-EA/IRMS

Abstract We report a newly developed method for analyzing the sulfur isotope ratio ( 34 S/ 32 S) of trace amounts of sulfate. This method consists of two steps: 1) isolation of sulfate via anion chromatography with fraction collection (IC-FC), and 2) precipitation of nanomolar-scale sulfate as barite within a tin capsule (nano-BP) for isotope measurement. In the first step of anion chromatography with fraction collection, the sulfate ion is isolated from other components with baseline resolution on the chromatogram. In the second nanomolar barite precipitation step, microcrystalline barite precipitates through reaction with BaCl 2 , followed by evaporation through heating. By conducting this reaction in a tin capsule for isotope ratio measurement, the collection or filtration of barite precipitates is not required. With our nano-EA/IRMS, sulfur content and isotope ratio can be determined in the 5–125 nmol sulfur content range. In this study, we further applied this method to carbonate-associated sulfate (CAS) extracted from natural samples, including foraminiferal shells from marine sediments and geological carbonates such as coral, limestone, and dolostone. Reliable δ 34 S values were obtained from as little as 5–10 nmol of sulfur, with standard deviations typically within ± 0.2–1.0‰ , reflecting differences in material homogeneity. The method successfully resolved δ 34 S variations among size fractions and stratigraphic layers in foraminifera and distinguished between carbonate types of different origins. These results demonstrate the method’s precision and robustness for analyzing CAS δ 34 S in diverse natural materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-025-00765-9
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nanomolar-scale sulfate sulfur isotope analysis using a combined ion chromatography–barite precipitation and nano-EA/IRMS

Yoshinori Takano, Naohiko Ohkouchi, Nanako O. Ogawa, Toshihiro Yoshimura et al.
2 citations
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
8.66
article

Nanomolar-scale sulfate sulfur isotope analysis using a combined ion chromatography–barite precipitation and nano-EA/IRMS

Yoshinori Takano, Naohiko Ohkouchi, Nanako O. Ogawa, Toshihiro Yoshimura, Junichiro Kuroda, Takeru Kochi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We report a newly developed method for analyzing the sulfur isotope ratio ( 34 S/ 32 S) of trace amounts of sulfate. This method consists of two steps: 1) isolation of sulfate via anion chromatography with fraction collection (IC-FC), and 2) precipitation of nanomolar-scale sulfate as barite within a tin capsule (nano-BP) for isotope measurement. In the first step of anion chromatography with fraction collection, the sulfate ion is isolated from other components with baseline resolution on the chromatogram. In the second nanomolar barite precipitation step, microcrystalline barite precipitates through reaction with BaCl 2 , followed by evaporation through heating. By conducting this reaction in a tin capsule for isotope ratio measurement, the collection or filtration of barite precipitates is not required. With our nano-EA/IRMS, sulfur content and isotope ratio can be determined in the 5–125 nmol sulfur content range. In this study, we further applied this method to carbonate-associated sulfate (CAS) extracted from natural samples, including foraminiferal shells from marine sediments and geological carbonates such as coral, limestone, and dolostone. Reliable δ 34 S values were obtained from as little as 5–10 nmol of sulfur, with standard deviations typically within ± 0.2–1.0‰ , reflecting differences in material homogeneity. The method successfully resolved δ 34 S variations among size fractions and stratigraphic layers in foraminifera and distinguished between carbonate types of different origins. These results demonstrate the method’s precision and robustness for analyzing CAS δ 34 S in diverse natural materials.

Progress in Earth and Planetary ScienceVol. 12(1)
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JP), Naval Hospital Yokosuka Japan (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, JST-Mirai Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
8.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.