Contrasting sensitivity and resilience to soil moisture and vapor pressure deficit between natural and planted forests under afforestation projects

Large-scale afforestation projects have significantly altered the temporal variability and spatial heterogeneity of regional water resources. The sensitivity of vegetation to hydrological changes and resilience are critical for understanding ecosystem adaptive capacity and stability. Clarifying how water resource variability and availability affect ecosystem sensitivity and resilience, and analyzing differences in ecological adaptation between planted and natural forests under afforestation, are essential for developing effective ecosystem management strategies and afforestation projects. This study constructed an ecosystem stability index based on sensitivity and resilience, and analyzed the controlling effects of water availability and variability on vegetation resilience from the perspectives of soil moisture (SM) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Results showed that ecosystems were more sensitive to SM variability than to VPD. Vegetation resilience was higher in areas with adequate moisture, whereas it was lower in regions with more pronounced moisture variations. Spatially, SM availability explained 55.6 % of the variation in vegetation resilience, while VPD availability explained 8.7 %. Natural forests had a higher sensitivity to moisture variability than planted forests (p < 0.05). The average resilience of natural forests was significantly higher than that of planted forests (p < 0.05). These results emphasize the importance of conserving and optimizing natural forest ecosystems. A comprehensive assessment of local soil moisture availability is recommended for future terrestrial ecosystem conservation projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127798
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasting sensitivity and resilience to soil moisture and vapor pressure deficit between natural and planted forests under afforestation projects

Jiangbo Gao, Fengxian Huang, Delong Li, Shaohong Wu et al.
1 citations
Journal of Environmental Management
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
1.11
article

Contrasting sensitivity and resilience to soil moisture and vapor pressure deficit between natural and planted forests under afforestation projects

Jiangbo Gao, Fengxian Huang, Delong Li, Shaohong Wu, Lulu Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Large-scale afforestation projects have significantly altered the temporal variability and spatial heterogeneity of regional water resources. The sensitivity of vegetation to hydrological changes and resilience are critical for understanding ecosystem adaptive capacity and stability. Clarifying how water resource variability and availability affect ecosystem sensitivity and resilience, and analyzing differences in ecological adaptation between planted and natural forests under afforestation, are essential for developing effective ecosystem management strategies and afforestation projects. This study constructed an ecosystem stability index based on sensitivity and resilience, and analyzed the controlling effects of water availability and variability on vegetation resilience from the perspectives of soil moisture (SM) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Results showed that ecosystems were more sensitive to SM variability than to VPD. Vegetation resilience was higher in areas with adequate moisture, whereas it was lower in regions with more pronounced moisture variations. Spatially, SM availability explained 55.6 % of the variation in vegetation resilience, while VPD availability explained 8.7 %. Natural forests had a higher sensitivity to moisture variability than planted forests (p < 0.05). The average resilience of natural forests was significantly higher than that of planted forests (p < 0.05). These results emphasize the importance of conserving and optimizing natural forest ecosystems. A comprehensive assessment of local soil moisture availability is recommended for future terrestrial ecosystem conservation projects.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 395
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.