Reflexive AI literacies: conceptualizing a model for learners’ critical engagement with generative AI

Despite the rapid worldwide increase in students’ use of AI, reflexivity remains underdeveloped in both research and practice. To address this gap, we analyse two case studies involving students in the United States and in Denmark, who utilized generative AI tools for creative tasks involving writing and visual presentations. Our findings reveal a significant gap between students’ recognition of ethical issues and their actual practices, highlighting burgeoning but superficial agency and limited reflexive engagement. Drawing on research on videogaming and literacies, we propose a new model for reflexive AI literacies based on three interconnected concepts: design and context, cybernetic relationships, and I-positions. This model emphasizes recursive, socially situated meaning making facilitated by reflexive pedagogy. Advocating for greater attention to reflexivity, we use this model to offer entry points for critically evaluating AI outputs, understanding biases, and assuming moral and ethical responsibility–key components for fostering sophisticated, responsible AI literacies essential for future education and society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pedagogies An International Journal
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480x.2025.2561972
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflexive AI literacies: conceptualizing a model for learners’ critical engagement with generative AI

Thorkild Hanghøj, Sandra Schamroth Abrams
1 citations
Pedagogies An International Journal
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Reflexive AI literacies: conceptualizing a model for learners’ critical engagement with generative AI

Thorkild Hanghøj, Sandra Schamroth Abrams
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite the rapid worldwide increase in students’ use of AI, reflexivity remains underdeveloped in both research and practice. To address this gap, we analyse two case studies involving students in the United States and in Denmark, who utilized generative AI tools for creative tasks involving writing and visual presentations. Our findings reveal a significant gap between students’ recognition of ethical issues and their actual practices, highlighting burgeoning but superficial agency and limited reflexive engagement. Drawing on research on videogaming and literacies, we propose a new model for reflexive AI literacies based on three interconnected concepts: design and context, cybernetic relationships, and I-positions. This model emphasizes recursive, socially situated meaning making facilitated by reflexive pedagogy. Advocating for greater attention to reflexivity, we use this model to offer entry points for critically evaluating AI outputs, understanding biases, and assuming moral and ethical responsibility–key components for fostering sophisticated, responsible AI literacies essential for future education and society.

Pedagogies An International Journal
University of South Africa (ZA), Aalborg University (DK), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reflexive AI literacies: conceptualizing a model for learners’ critical engagement with generative AI — Thorkild Hanghøj, Sandra Schamroth Abrams · Pedagogies An International Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS