Correlation of Clinical Frailty Scale and Outcomes in Patients Treated With Non-invasive Ventilation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background Frailty is defined as a state of vulnerability to stressors due to physiological decline. While frailty is an increasingly recognized determinant of outcomes in acute illness, its specific role in patients receiving non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for acute type 2 respiratory failure (T2RF) remains poorly defined. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 112 patients treated with NIV at a district general hospital in the United Kingdom between December 2024 and April 2025. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and categorised as CFS 1-3 (very fit to managing well), CFS 4-6 (mild to moderate frailty), and CFS 7-9 (severe frailty to terminally ill). Outcomes included inpatient mortality and readmissions within four months. Associations were analysed using the Chi-square test. Results Frailty was highly prevalent, affecting 90 (80.4%) patients in this cohort. Mortality rose significantly with frailty: one (4.5%) patient in CFS 1-3 group, 12 (21.4%) in CFS 4-6 group, and 14 (41.2%) in CFS 7-9 group (p = 0.006). Among survivors, 35 (41.2%) patients were re-admitted within four months, and did not differ significantly across frailty groups (p=0.400). Conclusion Frailty, as measured by the CFS, was a strong predictor of short-term mortality in patients receiving NIV for acute type 2 respiratory failure, independent of age. Routine frailty assessment could improve risk stratification and guide clinical decision-making in this patient group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.95641
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlation of Clinical Frailty Scale and Outcomes in Patients Treated With Non-invasive Ventilation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

M. Nazmul Huda, Nirish Vaidya, Rina Bandopadhyay, Ziaudeen Ansari et al.
Cureus
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Correlation of Clinical Frailty Scale and Outcomes in Patients Treated With Non-invasive Ventilation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

M. Nazmul Huda, Nirish Vaidya, Rina Bandopadhyay, Ziaudeen Ansari, Ayşe Burcu Ayaz, Abdelhaq Momtaz, Jasmin Maghamifar
article en

Abstract

Background Frailty is defined as a state of vulnerability to stressors due to physiological decline. While frailty is an increasingly recognized determinant of outcomes in acute illness, its specific role in patients receiving non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for acute type 2 respiratory failure (T2RF) remains poorly defined. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 112 patients treated with NIV at a district general hospital in the United Kingdom between December 2024 and April 2025. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and categorised as CFS 1-3 (very fit to managing well), CFS 4-6 (mild to moderate frailty), and CFS 7-9 (severe frailty to terminally ill). Outcomes included inpatient mortality and readmissions within four months. Associations were analysed using the Chi-square test. Results Frailty was highly prevalent, affecting 90 (80.4%) patients in this cohort. Mortality rose significantly with frailty: one (4.5%) patient in CFS 1-3 group, 12 (21.4%) in CFS 4-6 group, and 14 (41.2%) in CFS 7-9 group (p = 0.006). Among survivors, 35 (41.2%) patients were re-admitted within four months, and did not differ significantly across frailty groups (p=0.400). Conclusion Frailty, as measured by the CFS, was a strong predictor of short-term mortality in patients receiving NIV for acute type 2 respiratory failure, independent of age. Routine frailty assessment could improve risk stratification and guide clinical decision-making in this patient group.

CureusVol. 17(10)
Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.