Policy Boundaries in School Districts: When and How School Mathematics Enters the Policy Conversation

This multicase study of two school districts examined the policy boundaries educational leaders frame to define and demarcate the policy issues relevant to mathematics. Drawing on interviews with district leaders, observations of policymaking, and collection of artifacts, I found that meanings (or discourses) about the school subject constrained policymaking for mathematics to student achievement concerns. Subject-neutral policies that treat all subjects equally or ignore subject-matter were sometimes enacted in mathematics-specific ways, but other subject-neutral policies—including equity-minded efforts—were excluded from mathematics. These findings show how even seemingly subject-neutral policies are sensitive to the school subject and the ways meanings about the subject render some policy issues relevant to mathematics while excluding others. The results of this study have implications for how educational leaders and researchers partnering with schools might challenge and reconstruct policy boundaries, especially in ways that allow for more equity-minded policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AERA Open
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584251382555
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy Boundaries in School Districts: When and How School Mathematics Enters the Policy Conversation

Phi Nguyen
2 citations
AERA Open
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
17.85
article

Policy Boundaries in School Districts: When and How School Mathematics Enters the Policy Conversation

Phi Nguyen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This multicase study of two school districts examined the policy boundaries educational leaders frame to define and demarcate the policy issues relevant to mathematics. Drawing on interviews with district leaders, observations of policymaking, and collection of artifacts, I found that meanings (or discourses) about the school subject constrained policymaking for mathematics to student achievement concerns. Subject-neutral policies that treat all subjects equally or ignore subject-matter were sometimes enacted in mathematics-specific ways, but other subject-neutral policies—including equity-minded efforts—were excluded from mathematics. These findings show how even seemingly subject-neutral policies are sensitive to the school subject and the ways meanings about the subject render some policy issues relevant to mathematics while excluding others. The results of this study have implications for how educational leaders and researchers partnering with schools might challenge and reconstruct policy boundaries, especially in ways that allow for more equity-minded policies.

AERA OpenVol. 11
University of Illinois Chicago (US), American Marketing Association (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.