Behavioral Validity in Factorial Survey Experiments: Comparison of Factorial Survey Experiments and Field Experiments Concerning Recruitment of Disadvantaged Groups

The increased use of experiments in social research yields more discussions and knowledge about the design and utility of the methods. Based on previous research and two empirical studies that apply a factorial survey experiment (FSE) and a field experiment, both aiming at detecting employers’ recruitment behavior toward wheelchair users, I discuss the behavioral validity of an FSE and research ethics in both experiments. The results of the two experiments are highly comparable and indicate a high behavioral validity of the FSE in studies of recruitment behavior. While field experiments tend to enjoy precedence in the social sciences, they also involve serious ethical considerations. An FSE, on the other hand, is criticized for having a low behavioral validity but complies better with research ethics than field experiments. This study contributes with a nuanced understanding of the behavioral validity of an FSE in studies concerning hiring behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Field Methods
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x251329109
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behavioral Validity in Factorial Survey Experiments: Comparison of Factorial Survey Experiments and Field Experiments Concerning Recruitment of Disadvantaged Groups

Cecilie Krogh
Field Methods
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

Behavioral Validity in Factorial Survey Experiments: Comparison of Factorial Survey Experiments and Field Experiments Concerning Recruitment of Disadvantaged Groups

Cecilie Krogh
article en

Abstract

The increased use of experiments in social research yields more discussions and knowledge about the design and utility of the methods. Based on previous research and two empirical studies that apply a factorial survey experiment (FSE) and a field experiment, both aiming at detecting employers’ recruitment behavior toward wheelchair users, I discuss the behavioral validity of an FSE and research ethics in both experiments. The results of the two experiments are highly comparable and indicate a high behavioral validity of the FSE in studies of recruitment behavior. While field experiments tend to enjoy precedence in the social sciences, they also involve serious ethical considerations. An FSE, on the other hand, is criticized for having a low behavioral validity but complies better with research ethics than field experiments. This study contributes with a nuanced understanding of the behavioral validity of an FSE in studies concerning hiring behavior.

Field Methods
Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Behavioral Validity in Factorial Survey Experiments: Comparison of Factorial Survey Experiments and Field Experiments Concerning Recruitment of Disadvantaged Groups — Cecilie Krogh · Field Methods (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS