Development of a Transient Wellbore Heat Transfer Model Validated with Distributed Temperature Sensing Data
Distributed temperature sensing (DTS) has long been employed in the oil and gas industry to characterize reservoirs, optimize production, and extend well life. More recently, its application has expanded to geothermal energy development, where DTS provides critical insights into transient wellbore temperature profiles and flow behavior. A comprehensive understanding of such field measurements can be achieved by systematically comparing and interpreting DTS data in conjunction with robust numerical models. However, many existing wellbore models rely on steady-state heat transfer assumptions that fail to capture transient dynamics, while fully coupled wellbore-reservoir simulations are often computationally demanding and mathematically complex. This study aims to address this gap by developing a transient wellbore heat transfer model validated with DTS data. The model was formulated using a thermal-analogy approach based on the theoretical framework of Eickmeier et al. and implemented with a finite-difference scheme. Validation was performed by comparing thermal slug velocities predicted by the model with those extracted from DTS measurements. The results demonstrated strong agreement between modeled and measured slug velocities, confirming the model's reliability. In addition, the modeled thermal slug velocity was lower than the corresponding fluid velocity, indicating that thermal front propagates more slowly than the fluid front. Consequently, this computationally efficient approach enhances the interpretation of DTS data and offers a practical tool for improved monitoring and management of geothermal operations.
Authors
- Smith Leggett
- Rion Nakamoto
Institutions
- Texas Tech University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Sensors
- Published
- 2025-10-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/s25216583
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.36