Feminist Communities of Practice: Building Stronger Research Coalitions to Counter Antagonism in the Academy

In the face of academic antagonism, this article argues that feminists must build caring and careful communities of practice to sustain ourselves. In it we explore the importance of creating intentional, feminist-oriented spaces of actionable solidarity to protect activists and academics from institutional antagonisms. Through our encounters as researchers working within feminist archives, and as academics who are part of feminist research collectives, we have developed a process for creating provisional solidarities that protect both our persons and our activisms. This process is based on our lived experiences, archival explorations, and social media research that informs our sometimes messy and often nuanced praxes of community-building as a counterpoint to increasing neo-liberal co-option of discourses of solidarity. In this paper we provide some guideposts for how we do our work as a way of inviting further conversation around how to manage the antagonisms we face as feminist scholars.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Social Justice
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v19i3.5142
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feminist Communities of Practice: Building Stronger Research Coalitions to Counter Antagonism in the Academy

Shana MacDonald, Kelly Bradley
Studies in Social Justice
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Feminist Communities of Practice: Building Stronger Research Coalitions to Counter Antagonism in the Academy

Shana MacDonald, Kelly Bradley
article en

Abstract

In the face of academic antagonism, this article argues that feminists must build caring and careful communities of practice to sustain ourselves. In it we explore the importance of creating intentional, feminist-oriented spaces of actionable solidarity to protect activists and academics from institutional antagonisms. Through our encounters as researchers working within feminist archives, and as academics who are part of feminist research collectives, we have developed a process for creating provisional solidarities that protect both our persons and our activisms. This process is based on our lived experiences, archival explorations, and social media research that informs our sometimes messy and often nuanced praxes of community-building as a counterpoint to increasing neo-liberal co-option of discourses of solidarity. In this paper we provide some guideposts for how we do our work as a way of inviting further conversation around how to manage the antagonisms we face as feminist scholars.

Studies in Social JusticeVol. 19(3)
University of Waterloo (CA), University of Ottawa (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Feminist Communities of Practice: Building Stronger Research Coalitions to Counter Antagonism in the Academy — Shana MacDonald, Kelly Bradley · Studies in Social Justice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS