We Killed Them First: How the Robert Pickton Investigation Revealed Systemic and Intersectional Discrimination within Canada

Robert Pickton is often considered to be Canada’s most notorious serial killer. By his own estimation, he murdered 49 women over at least 5 years (Craig, 3). The Pickton case brought attention to fundamental issues within the Canadian justice system and highlighted systemic inequities. From the outset, the police failed to take the issue of missing and murdered women seriously because the women were considered expendable. As members of several marginalized communities at the intersection of race, low socioeconomic status, and stigmatized labour, the loss of these women was considered acceptable. I argue that the intersection of these characteristics that were “accepted” as defining Pickton’s victims demonstrates that the assumptions and biases of those who enforce the law (police and judges) can seriously impair the system's ability to create equitable outcomes. Utilizing media analysis, this paper looks at the language commonly found in articles about Pickton and his victims to demonstrate the role intersectional characteristics played in crafting certain narratives to the public.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Social Justice
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v19i3.4840
Primary Topic
Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

We Killed Them First: How the Robert Pickton Investigation Revealed Systemic and Intersectional Discrimination within Canada

Neyve Egger
Studies in Social Justice
Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
article

We Killed Them First: How the Robert Pickton Investigation Revealed Systemic and Intersectional Discrimination within Canada

Neyve Egger
article en

Abstract

Robert Pickton is often considered to be Canada’s most notorious serial killer. By his own estimation, he murdered 49 women over at least 5 years (Craig, 3). The Pickton case brought attention to fundamental issues within the Canadian justice system and highlighted systemic inequities. From the outset, the police failed to take the issue of missing and murdered women seriously because the women were considered expendable. As members of several marginalized communities at the intersection of race, low socioeconomic status, and stigmatized labour, the loss of these women was considered acceptable. I argue that the intersection of these characteristics that were “accepted” as defining Pickton’s victims demonstrates that the assumptions and biases of those who enforce the law (police and judges) can seriously impair the system's ability to create equitable outcomes. Utilizing media analysis, this paper looks at the language commonly found in articles about Pickton and his victims to demonstrate the role intersectional characteristics played in crafting certain narratives to the public.

Studies in Social JusticeVol. 19(3)
University of St Andrews (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

We Killed Them First: How the Robert Pickton Investigation Revealed Systemic and Intersectional Discrimination within Canada — Neyve Egger · Studies in Social Justice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS