Reimagining rural policy through mission‐led governance

Abstract Mission‐led governance has emerged as a popular policy approach to address complex societal challenges through ambitious, cross‐sectoral goals. However, concerns persist about its top‐down nature, lack of spatial sensitivity and potential incompatibility with place‐based approaches. A particular concern is that it might marginalise rural areas. This commentary examines whether mission‐led governance can deliver for rural communities by fostering vertical (multi‐level) and horizontal (cross‐departmental) policy integration to advance rural well‐being. We juxtapose mission‐led approaches with outcome‐oriented well‐being frameworks, highlighting lessons from international experiences in the United Kingdom and Europe. While both approaches share ambitions for systemic change, each faces challenges in their application to diverse places. Rural policy faces particular challenges, many of which require place‐sensitive responses: siloed governance, urban‐centric biases and loss of institutional capacity. We critique conventional rural proofing as reactive and consider three potential pathways for mission‐led rural policy: (1) a dedicated rural mission to prioritise place‐based needs, (2) embedding rural considerations within existing missions, or (3) a hybrid model combining mission‐led steering with well‐being framework principles. We argue for the third approach, emphasising participatory governance, flexible local targets that reflect place diversity, and cross‐departmental accountability. Key lessons include the need for political leadership, aligned institutional incentives and co‐creation with rural stakeholders. Without deliberate attention to rural spatial justice, mission‐led policies risk perpetuating inequalities. We conclude that missions could revitalise rural governance if reconfigured as collaborative, multi‐level endeavours, offering a timely alternative to fragmented policy. The paper also identifies future research directions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geographical Journal
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.70053
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining rural policy through mission‐led governance

Jayne Glass, Mark Shucksmith
1 citations
Geographical Journal
Rural development and sustainability
4.83
article

Reimagining rural policy through mission‐led governance

Jayne Glass, Mark Shucksmith
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Mission‐led governance has emerged as a popular policy approach to address complex societal challenges through ambitious, cross‐sectoral goals. However, concerns persist about its top‐down nature, lack of spatial sensitivity and potential incompatibility with place‐based approaches. A particular concern is that it might marginalise rural areas. This commentary examines whether mission‐led governance can deliver for rural communities by fostering vertical (multi‐level) and horizontal (cross‐departmental) policy integration to advance rural well‐being. We juxtapose mission‐led approaches with outcome‐oriented well‐being frameworks, highlighting lessons from international experiences in the United Kingdom and Europe. While both approaches share ambitions for systemic change, each faces challenges in their application to diverse places. Rural policy faces particular challenges, many of which require place‐sensitive responses: siloed governance, urban‐centric biases and loss of institutional capacity. We critique conventional rural proofing as reactive and consider three potential pathways for mission‐led rural policy: (1) a dedicated rural mission to prioritise place‐based needs, (2) embedding rural considerations within existing missions, or (3) a hybrid model combining mission‐led steering with well‐being framework principles. We argue for the third approach, emphasising participatory governance, flexible local targets that reflect place diversity, and cross‐departmental accountability. Key lessons include the need for political leadership, aligned institutional incentives and co‐creation with rural stakeholders. Without deliberate attention to rural spatial justice, mission‐led policies risk perpetuating inequalities. We conclude that missions could revitalise rural governance if reconfigured as collaborative, multi‐level endeavours, offering a timely alternative to fragmented policy. The paper also identifies future research directions.

Geographical JournalVol. 191(4)
Uppsala University (SE), Newcastle College (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Rural development and sustainability
4.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.