Trustworthy AI in education: Framework, cases, and governance strategies

Artificial intelligence (AI) in education has triggered significant debates about ethics, fairness, and accountability. This article introduces a five-dimensional trust framework to evaluate educational AI systems across five key domains: privacy, safety, fairness, explainability, and accountability. Through a comparative analysis of four representative cases—a virtual teaching assistant, an adaptive learning platform, an algorithmic grading system, and an AI-based proctoring tool—we identify recurring trust-related risks and systemic governance vulnerabilities, such as insufficient oversight, lack of transparency, and unclear accountability mechanisms. The analysis reveals risks such as data breaches, bias, opaque decision-making, and ambiguous responsibility. To address these issues, we propose multi-stakeholder governance strategies, including ethical-by-design principles, institutional oversight, and regulatory standards. This study concludes by outlining major avenues for future research, such as developing explainable AI systems tailored to educational settings, constructing trust models for human–AI collaboration, and evaluating the enduring impacts of AI governance structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation and Emerging Technologies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s2737599425500264
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trustworthy AI in education: Framework, cases, and governance strategies

Kang Hao Cheong, Shuangxue Liu, Yiping Ma, Xinjin Li et al.
2 citations
Innovation and Emerging Technologies
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
4.96
article

Trustworthy AI in education: Framework, cases, and governance strategies

Kang Hao Cheong, Shuangxue Liu, Yiping Ma, Xinjin Li, Shiyu Hu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) in education has triggered significant debates about ethics, fairness, and accountability. This article introduces a five-dimensional trust framework to evaluate educational AI systems across five key domains: privacy, safety, fairness, explainability, and accountability. Through a comparative analysis of four representative cases—a virtual teaching assistant, an adaptive learning platform, an algorithmic grading system, and an AI-based proctoring tool—we identify recurring trust-related risks and systemic governance vulnerabilities, such as insufficient oversight, lack of transparency, and unclear accountability mechanisms. The analysis reveals risks such as data breaches, bias, opaque decision-making, and ambiguous responsibility. To address these issues, we propose multi-stakeholder governance strategies, including ethical-by-design principles, institutional oversight, and regulatory standards. This study concludes by outlining major avenues for future research, such as developing explainable AI systems tailored to educational settings, constructing trust models for human–AI collaboration, and evaluating the enduring impacts of AI governance structures.

Innovation and Emerging TechnologiesVol. 12
Nanyang Technological University (SG), East China Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.