Perspectives on Racial and Ethnic Health Equity in Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Guidelines

Evidence synthesis and guideline groups have the potential to address health disparities. In June 2024, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) cosponsored a summit to address racial and ethnic health equity in systematic reviews and other syntheses and guidelines, with support from Cochrane US. This article summarizes cross-cutting themes around future directions for systematic reviews and guidelines. Discussions addressed include the rationale for addressing racial health equity in systematic reviews and guidelines; representation of people with lived experience in systematic reviews and guidelines; approaches to developing and addressing equity-focused scope, including frameworks, methods, and thoughtful interpretation in systematic reviews; challenges and opportunities for guideline recommendations; need for standardized language and reporting for race and ethnicity in primary research studies, systematic reviews, and guidelines; and measures to track the progress of incorporating and addressing racial and ethnic health equity in systematic reviews and guidelines. Participants acknowledged that a one-size-fits-all approach was not possible or desired. Consensus priorities for next steps were to develop methods guidance to address equity in systematic reviews and guidelines; develop measures to track the progress of addressing racial and health equity in systematic reviews and guidelines; operationalize engaging representative interest holders in systematic reviews and guidelines; and share resources and learning for advancing health equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7326/annals-24-03875
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives on Racial and Ethnic Health Equity in Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Guidelines

Jennifer S Lin, Amy Cantor, Dru Riddle, Elizabeth M. Webber et al.
3 citations
Annals of Internal Medicine
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
4.20
article

Perspectives on Racial and Ethnic Health Equity in Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Guidelines

Jennifer S Lin, Amy Cantor, Dru Riddle, Elizabeth M. Webber, Shahnaz Sultan, Vivian Welch, Meera Sushila Viswanathan, Celia Fiordalisi, Rania Ali, Shazia Mehmood Siddique, Christine Fu, Margaret Maglione, Kelley Tipton, Nila A Sathe, Edi Kuhn
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Evidence synthesis and guideline groups have the potential to address health disparities. In June 2024, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) cosponsored a summit to address racial and ethnic health equity in systematic reviews and other syntheses and guidelines, with support from Cochrane US. This article summarizes cross-cutting themes around future directions for systematic reviews and guidelines. Discussions addressed include the rationale for addressing racial health equity in systematic reviews and guidelines; representation of people with lived experience in systematic reviews and guidelines; approaches to developing and addressing equity-focused scope, including frameworks, methods, and thoughtful interpretation in systematic reviews; challenges and opportunities for guideline recommendations; need for standardized language and reporting for race and ethnicity in primary research studies, systematic reviews, and guidelines; and measures to track the progress of incorporating and addressing racial and ethnic health equity in systematic reviews and guidelines. Participants acknowledged that a one-size-fits-all approach was not possible or desired. Consensus priorities for next steps were to develop methods guidance to address equity in systematic reviews and guidelines; develop measures to track the progress of addressing racial and health equity in systematic reviews and guidelines; operationalize engaging representative interest holders in systematic reviews and guidelines; and share resources and learning for advancing health equity.

Annals of Internal MedicineVol. 178(11_Supplement)
ECRI Institute (US), University of Southern California (US), Texas Christian University (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), RTI International (US), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US), Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US), Bruyère (CA), Portland VA Research Foundation (US), Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.